Computational Materials Science 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-56542-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 622 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ε 2B ref (k) is the 2B QM reference energy for the k th configuration in the 2B training set, with V elec (k), V pol (k), and V 2B disp (i) describing permanent electrostatics, polarization, and dispersion energy, respectively (Eqs. [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: E Parameterization and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ε 2B ref (k) is the 2B QM reference energy for the k th configuration in the 2B training set, with V elec (k), V pol (k), and V 2B disp (i) describing permanent electrostatics, polarization, and dispersion energy, respectively (Eqs. [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: E Parameterization and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular-level computer simulations, such as molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, 1,2 have become an indispensable tool in molecular sciences, providing fundamental insights into structural, thermodynamic, and dynamical properties of molecular systems, from materials to biomolecules, which are difficult (if not impossible) to obtain by other means. [3][4][5][6][7][8] However, the level of realism and the predictive power of any MD and MC simulation depends sensitively on the accuracy of the potential energy function (PEF) used to represent the multidimensional potential energy surface (PES) of the molecular system in question. In the early days of computer simulations, due to limited computational resources, the only effectively suitable PEFs were empirically parameterized force fields (FFs) that adopted relatively simple expressions to describe intramolecular distortions and purely pairwise additive functions to describe intermolecular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, recent advances in computing have made the investigation of the mechanics of fluids and materials on nano-scales feasible with the use of molecular models. Molecular models can be simulated using two techniques: molecular dynamics (102) and Monte Carlo (103) . The computational expense limits the use of these methods to a number of atoms relatively small compared to macro-scale problems.…”
Section: Multi-physics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular-level computer simulations, such as molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, 1,2 have become an indispensable tool in molecular sciences, providing fundamental insights into structural, thermodynamic, and dynamical properties of molecular systems, from materials to biomolecules, which are difficult (if not impossible) to obtain by other means. [3][4][5][6][7][8] However, the level of realism and the predictive power of any MD and MC simulation depends sensitively on the accuracy of the potential energy function (PEF) used to represent the multidimensional potential energy surface (PES) of the molecular system in question. In the early days of computer simulations, due to limited computational resources, the only effectively suitable PEFs were empirically parameterized force fields (FFs) that adopted relatively simple expressions to describe intramolecular distortions and purely pairwise additive functions to describe intermolecular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%