2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Flexible Force Field for Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Dummy Model Coordination Bonds

Abstract: We present force fields developed from periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations that can be used in classical molecular simulations to model M-MOF-74 (M = Co, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn) and its extended linker analogs. Our force fields are based on cationic dummy models (CDMs). These dummy models simplify the methodology required to tune the parameters and improve the accuracy of the force fields. We have used our force fields to compare mechanical properties across the M-MOF-74 series, and determine tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better understand the physical origins of the structural collapse of M 2 (NDISA), we used a recently developed model for M 2 (dobdc) analogues to perform simulations of the framework. 50 This model was previously tested successfully on a series of isoreticular M 2 (dobdc) analogues that are known to be stable upon activation. This series included IRMOF-74-V, which has a structure similar to M 2 (NDISA), but slightly larger pores (38 Å).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to better understand the physical origins of the structural collapse of M 2 (NDISA), we used a recently developed model for M 2 (dobdc) analogues to perform simulations of the framework. 50 This model was previously tested successfully on a series of isoreticular M 2 (dobdc) analogues that are known to be stable upon activation. This series included IRMOF-74-V, which has a structure similar to M 2 (NDISA), but slightly larger pores (38 Å).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal−metal and metal−oxygen interactions are taken from a model for M 2 (dobdc) analogues. 50 Geometric mixing rules are used to combine DREIDING Lennard-Jones parameters for carbon and hydrogen with the M 2 (dobdc) model-based metal−metal interactions to compute the nonbonded metal−carbon and metal−hydrogen interactions. Nonbonded and short-range electrostatic interactions were truncated at 12.5 Å, and Ewald summations were used to calculate long-range electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Force field information and GCMC settings are provided in S2.2. 39,40,60 How, and at what pressure, any S-shaped adsorption profile occurs will clearly depend on the underlying framework and framework-guest potential energy surface, although we are unaware of any specialized MOF force fields [61][62][63][64] designed specifically for this Sr coordination environment that also capture the non-bonded interactions between methane and the open metal site. [65][66][67][68] Nonetheless, the true isotherm will be bounded between the F| DFT F and F| DFT F•8CH 4 isotherms.…”
Section: Configmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61,62,63] Extended versions of UFF [64,65] and more specialized FFs [66,67] have also been proposed. Ab initio derived [68,69,70] and explicitly polarizable [71,72,73] FFs help to significantly improve the description of intermolecular interactions only for small series of isoreticular structures, leaving the aforementioned dilemma largely unaddressed. Therefore, to facilitate HTS adsorption studies, it is necessary to develop a fast automatized procedure for the generation of FF components, which will be suitable for various atomic types presented in MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%