2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculations, structure, NBO and NCI analyses of X H⋯π interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is rendered by the VMD 1.9.3 program [53] . The NCI method has been employed on numerous recent studies to understand the nature of bonding in non‐covalent interaction based complexes [54,55] . NCI analysis provides isosurface of RDG and a 2D plot of reduced density gradient ( s ) versus sign( λ 2 ) ρ. G enerally, the strong interactions are characterized by sign( λ 2 ) ρ <0, weak van der Waals by sign( λ 2 ) ρ ≅0, and non‐bonded interactions like steric repulsion by sign( λ 2 ) ρ >0 [55] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is rendered by the VMD 1.9.3 program [53] . The NCI method has been employed on numerous recent studies to understand the nature of bonding in non‐covalent interaction based complexes [54,55] . NCI analysis provides isosurface of RDG and a 2D plot of reduced density gradient ( s ) versus sign( λ 2 ) ρ. G enerally, the strong interactions are characterized by sign( λ 2 ) ρ <0, weak van der Waals by sign( λ 2 ) ρ ≅0, and non‐bonded interactions like steric repulsion by sign( λ 2 ) ρ >0 [55] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCI method has been employed on numerous recent studies to understand the nature of bonding in non‐covalent interaction based complexes [54,55] . NCI analysis provides isosurface of RDG and a 2D plot of reduced density gradient ( s ) versus sign( λ 2 ) ρ. G enerally, the strong interactions are characterized by sign( λ 2 ) ρ <0, weak van der Waals by sign( λ 2 ) ρ ≅0, and non‐bonded interactions like steric repulsion by sign( λ 2 ) ρ >0 [55] . As shown in Figure 5, green surface between SO 3 and pyridine ring indicates that the interaction has dispersive character which is often observed for interactions involving π‐electrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scatter plots and color-mapped surfaces of other composites are shown in Figures S30–S41 of the Supporting Information. The red, green, and blue color codes according to the value of sign (λ 2 ) ρ ranging from −0.04 to 0.02 au are used to describe destabilizing steric interactions (0.02–0.04 au), van der Waals (−0.01 to 0.01 au), and stabilizing hydrogen bond (−0.01 to −0.04 au). The color-filled RDG surfaces also indicate the type of interaction according to the color codes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing the strengths of these interactions and their hierarchical nature is central to future work in materials design. While information on sublimation energies could give some insight into the sum of all intermolecular forces, measurements of individual intermolecular interactions are a significant challenge and best undertaken computationally. Early approaches to understanding the hierarchy of intermolecular forces in DTDA radicals employed a simple atom–atom potential model based on a Lennard-Jones potential for dispersion, coupled with atom-based partial charges for electrostatics derived from molecular electrostatic potential surfaces . These replicated the structural features, but the total energies were potentially unreliable since the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP)-derived charges were extracted from semi-empirical methods and additional intermolecular forces, such as charge-transfer interactions, were entirely neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%