2009
DOI: 10.1021/je800862x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Calculations of Carbon-Containing Species and Comparison with Group Additivity Results. Part II. C4 Species

Abstract: The thermochemistry of 34 C 4 compounds and radicals related to combustion processes have been calculated using the ab initio G3B3 method. The results have been compared to group additivity results and literature values if available. Three different group additivity programs were used, and results concerning the comparison are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when different software identifies the same groups in a molecule, differences result in the exact value of estimation. When assessing three group additivity packages, THERM, NIST, and THERGAS, different thermo values resulted even when the same groups were found . A more thorough comparison of different additivity implementations and a standardized method to refit group additivity parameters would be helpful in ensuring additivity values are both accurate, up to date and consistent.…”
Section: Sars For Thermochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when different software identifies the same groups in a molecule, differences result in the exact value of estimation. When assessing three group additivity packages, THERM, NIST, and THERGAS, different thermo values resulted even when the same groups were found . A more thorough comparison of different additivity implementations and a standardized method to refit group additivity parameters would be helpful in ensuring additivity values are both accurate, up to date and consistent.…”
Section: Sars For Thermochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an algorithm that is easy to program and several computer codes have been developed for the purpose (Stein et al 1991, Ritter 1991, Ritter and Bozzelli 1991, Muller et al 1995, CHETAH 1998, Blurock et al 2012, RMG webpage 2012 (for the parameters used in CHETAH see Poling et al (2001) ). Some useful remarks on the applicability of the first three codes can be found in (Burcat 2009). …”
Section: Additivity Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%