1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-458x(199908)37:8<551::aid-mrc503>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculation of NMR shielding in phosphaalkenes X—PCY2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows the bond lengths and bond angles around the PdC core calculated with several methods and the 6-311++G** basis set for the series XPdC(CH 3 ) 2 (X ) H, F, Cl, Br, and OH). The Hartree-Fock data are from Rozhenko et al, 43 and the other data are from a The HF data are from reference 43; the other data are from this work. b C 1 and C 2 are trans and cis to X, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows the bond lengths and bond angles around the PdC core calculated with several methods and the 6-311++G** basis set for the series XPdC(CH 3 ) 2 (X ) H, F, Cl, Br, and OH). The Hartree-Fock data are from Rozhenko et al, 43 and the other data are from a The HF data are from reference 43; the other data are from this work. b C 1 and C 2 are trans and cis to X, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the available data attract considerable interest, taking into account exceptionally broad range of variation of phosphorus chemical shifts (up to 500 ppm) and important structural information that could be obtained therefrom. Analysis of various factors affecting the accuracy of calculation of δ P values for organophosphorus compounds was performed only in some recent studies [9][10][11]; in particular, comparison of different electron density functionals, basis sets, and methods for consideration of gauge invariance.In the present work we estimated the accuracy in the calculation of 31 P shielding constants (chemical shifts), depending on the calculation method (level of theory) and basis set (primarily its size and flexibility) for effective and appropriate use of these parameters in stereochemical studies on organophosphorus compounds. As subjects for study we selected nine simplest organophosphorus compounds of different natures: phosphines R 3 P (I-III), phosphine oxides R 3 P=O (IV-VI), and phosphine sulfides R 3 P=S (VII-IX) containing methyl, ethyl, and methoxy groups on the phosphorus (I, IV, VII, R = Me; II, V, VIII, R = Et; III, VI, IX, R = MeO).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, the available data attract considerable interest, taking into account exceptionally broad range of variation of phosphorus chemical shifts (up to 500 ppm) and important structural information that could be obtained therefrom. Analysis of various factors affecting the accuracy of calculation of δ P values for organophosphorus compounds was performed only in some recent studies [9][10][11]; in particular, comparison of different electron density functionals, basis sets, and methods for consideration of gauge invariance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the 31 P nuclear magnetic shielding constants and chemical shifts have been obtained in different molecules. 17,[22][23][24][25][26] Recent findings indicate that our understanding of methods and basis sets is incomplete. The advantages of computational studies in many fields of chemistry showed that the optimal calculation is the most important, and choosing the methods and basis sets is an essential step in computational studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%