2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3697(03)00208-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculation of intrinsic point defects in CuInSe2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the atomic arrangement in the unit cell is relaxed using LDA or GGA functionals the anion displacement u is systematically underestimated by 5-10%, in agreement with previous results [96,100,101]. Moreover, always within LDA/GGA, the KS bottom conduction band overlaps the KS top valence band, yielding negative band gaps [102].…”
Section: Cu-based Thin-film Absorberssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…If the atomic arrangement in the unit cell is relaxed using LDA or GGA functionals the anion displacement u is systematically underestimated by 5-10%, in agreement with previous results [96,100,101]. Moreover, always within LDA/GGA, the KS bottom conduction band overlaps the KS top valence band, yielding negative band gaps [102].…”
Section: Cu-based Thin-film Absorberssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Actually, a Mulliken population analysis using a first principles plane wave pseudopotential calculation (CASTEP code) indicated that chemical bonding in CIS, especially the CuSe bonding, has strong covalent character. 26), 27) In the vicinity of the GB, the atomic relaxation for Cu and In vacancies are basically the same as that in the bulk interior. That is, the relaxation for V Cu 0 and V In 0 are approximately ¹4 to ¹5% and ¹8 to ¹10%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As the samples in which dislocation loops were observed were slightly selenium rich it is also quite possible that the selenium vacancy population was suppressed by this excessa similar argument works for copper but not for indium due to the composition of the samples studied. However, the indium vacancy population could have been suppressed by a copper excess as the Cu In antisite defect has been calculated to have a relatively low creation energy of between 1.11 and 1.54 eV [120,[126][127][128][129] (although there is one out-lying value of 1.90 eV…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the indium vacancy population could have been suppressed by a copper excess as the Cu In antisite defect has been calculated to have a relatively low creation energy of between 1.11 and 1.54 eV [120,[126][127][128][129] (although there is one out-lying value of 1.90 eV [130]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%