2017
DOI: 10.1002/hep.29086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
3,098
2
39

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,346 publications
(3,368 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
13
3,098
2
39
Order By: Relevance
“…Nodule biopsy may represent an alternative option, but the invasiveness and risk of complications (e.g., bleeding) strongly limit its usage [21]. Of note, in our series, all noHCCs with increased size at follow-up were high-or lowgrade dysplastic nodules at pathology analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Nodule biopsy may represent an alternative option, but the invasiveness and risk of complications (e.g., bleeding) strongly limit its usage [21]. Of note, in our series, all noHCCs with increased size at follow-up were high-or lowgrade dysplastic nodules at pathology analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Screening modalities consist of the periodic application of diagnostic tools with cost effectiveness which is generally taken into consideration based on the gain of life expectancy and guidelines indicating that an incidence of ≥ 1.5% year would warrant surveillance of HCC in cirrhosis [25,26] . Guidelines including the last updated screening section with data-supported recommendations were selected for the review; recommendations are as follows.…”
Section: Screening Recommendations For Cirrhotic Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AASLD does not suggest performing surveillance of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are on the transplant waiting list, given the low anticipated survival for these patients. They pointed out some technical remarks regarding screening modalities (US alone or plus AFP), interval (4-8 months) and modification in screening strategy based on etiology of liver diseases or risk stratification models [26] . In the previous guideline (AASLD-2011), ultrasound scanning alone was recommended [27] .…”
Section: From North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As local representatives, members representing Society of Gastroenterology, Radiology, Oncology, Pathology and General Surgery, participated in the discussions. Already published European association of study of liver disease guidelines [3], Asia Pacific clinical practice guidelines 2017 [4] and American association of study of liver disease guidelines 2016 [5], were used as a baseline platform. Each point was taken up, discussed and debated prior to an agreement.…”
Section: Hepatitis Screening In Sri Lankan Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%