The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AAfrag: Interpolation routines for Monte Carlo results on secondary production in proton–proton, proton–nucleus and nucleus–nucleus interactions

Abstract: We provide a compilation of predictions of the QGSJET-II-04m model for the production of secondary species (photons, neutrinos, electrons, positrons, and antinucleons) that are covering a wide range of energies of the beam particles in proton-proton, proton-nucleus, nucleus-proton, and nucleus-nucleus reactions. The current version of QGSJET-II-04m has an improved treatment of the production of secondary particles at low energies: the parameters of the hadronization procedure have been fine-tuned, based on a n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, however, production cross sections calculated for the specific primary and target nuclei should be used, which are provided e.g. by the parametrisation AAfrag [131].…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, however, production cross sections calculated for the specific primary and target nuclei should be used, which are provided e.g. by the parametrisation AAfrag [131].…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is mostly sensitive to the low-energy part, so the latter model is only used to get a rough estimate of the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross sections. The secondary positron flux is 10-20% larger with Kachelrieß et al (2019) than with Kamae et al (2006) values.…”
Section: Error Budgetmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Concerning production cross-section uncertainties, we recall that we use Kamae et al (2006) parametrisation. More recent values exist (Kachelrieß et al 2019) -they are calibrated on more recent collider data and include incident and target species up to Fe -, but they are only valid for incident nucleus energy greater than 4 GeV. Our analysis is mostly sensitive to the low-energy part, so the latter model is only used to get a rough estimate of the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross sections.…”
Section: Error Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GALPROP calculates production of secondary particles in pp-, pA-, Ap-, AA-interactions. Calculations ofp production and propagation are detailed in Moskalenko et al (2002), , and Kachelriess et al (2015Kachelriess et al ( , 2019. Production of neutral mesons (π 0 , K 0 ,K 0 , etc.…”
Section: Galprop Model For Galactic Cr Propagation and Diffuse Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of neutral mesons (π 0 , K 0 ,K 0 , etc. ), and secondary e ± is calculated using the formalism by Dermer (1986a,b), as described in , or recent parameterizations by Kamae et al (2006), Kachelrieß & Ostapchenko (2012), Kachelriess et al (2014Kachelriess et al ( , 2019. γ-ray production and synchrotron emission are calculated using the propagated CR distributions, including primary e − , secondary e ± , and for γ-rays -including secondary p from inelastic processes (Strong et al 2004(Strong et al , 2010Porter et al 2008;Orlando & Strong 2013).…”
Section: Galprop Model For Galactic Cr Propagation and Diffuse Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%