2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to and Delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta‐analyses suggested that CR participation can reduce all‐cause mortality by 15% to 28% for patients with MI4, 37, 38, 39 and 45% to 47% for patients with percutaneous coronary intervention 40. The effect was estimated to be comparable to improvements associated with aspirin, β‐blocker, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor, statin, and anticoagulant therapy 5, 41, 42, 43. However, the generalizability of these results was limited because the majority of trial participants were highly selected low‐risk white males, with few females, minorities, or elderly patients, and with short duration of follow‐up 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta‐analyses suggested that CR participation can reduce all‐cause mortality by 15% to 28% for patients with MI4, 37, 38, 39 and 45% to 47% for patients with percutaneous coronary intervention 40. The effect was estimated to be comparable to improvements associated with aspirin, β‐blocker, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor, statin, and anticoagulant therapy 5, 41, 42, 43. However, the generalizability of these results was limited because the majority of trial participants were highly selected low‐risk white males, with few females, minorities, or elderly patients, and with short duration of follow‐up 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is our hope that application of these performance measures will provide a mechanism through which the quality of medical care can be measured and improved. (7). This document updates the 2 measures that articulate the opportunities to improve referrals to outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation that were embodied in Measure Set A from that 2007 paper (Appendix A in [7]).…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(7). This document updates the 2 measures that articulate the opportunities to improve referrals to outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation that were embodied in Measure Set A from that 2007 paper (Appendix A in [7]). Measure A-1 (Cardiac Rehabilitation Patient Referral From an Inpatient Setting) and measure A-2 (Cardiac Rehabilitation Patient Referral From an Outpatient Setting) have been revised to clarify several aspects of the measures and to facilitate their implementation.…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,3 We recommend that these ACC/AHA performance measures be used whenever the Million Hearts measures are translated to the practitioner or group level. The ACC/AHA and its partner organizations including the AMA-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) have carefully crafted these measures with knowledge that they would be used for accountability purposes at the individual practitioner level.…”
Section: The General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%