2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AA_stat: Intelligent profiling of in vivo and in vitro modifications from open search results

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that HOMS-TC can identify biologically relevant PTMs through the OMS. Note that HOMS-TC does not determine modification identities, but they can be obtained from the precursor mass difference using post-processing tools like PTM-Shepherd ( Geiszler et al 2021 ) and AA_stat ( Levitsky et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that HOMS-TC can identify biologically relevant PTMs through the OMS. Note that HOMS-TC does not determine modification identities, but they can be obtained from the precursor mass difference using post-processing tools like PTM-Shepherd ( Geiszler et al 2021 ) and AA_stat ( Levitsky et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For LysC digestion, the cleavage rule was set to LysC and up to two miscleavages were allowed. Search parameters for Confetti data were the same, except that the fixed modification on cysteine was set to N -ethylmaleimide (this decision was motivated by previous analysis of modifications with AA_stat). , Also, for each protease, its corresponding rule was specified, and the number of allowed miscleavages was set as follows: two for ArgC, four for AspN, six for chymotrypsin, four for GluC, two for LysC, and two for trypsin. For elastase, nonspecific cleavage was used.…”
Section: Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%