Untitled

Abstract

The development of the corporate function as a means of organizing socially oriented societies towards profit-seeking activities not least triggers negative impacts. One of the negative impacts is the emergence of criminal acts committed by corporations. In order to get as much profit as possible, corporations take actions that can cause losses to consumers, one of which is by mixing non-halal content into products labeled as halal. The purpose of this article are, First, to provide an overview of corporate legal policy as a criminal law subject and Second, to be able to know the corporate responsibility for non-halal content in halal-certified food products as an effort to protect consumers. The results of this study are policies regarding corporations as subjects of criminal law in which their actions can be prosecuted and held criminal liability are contained in special legislation outside the criminal code. Corporate liability regarding non-halal content in halal-certified food products follows a direct accountability system. This means that criminal liability for violations of the halal label can be addressed either to individuals or corporations where corporate responsibility is imposed on its management as stipulated in Article 61 of The Consumer Protection Laws.

Hospital criminal liability as a corporation of patient rejection in infected with covid-19

“…In legal science, legal subjects known as rights and obligations holders consisting of humans (naturlijke persoon) and legal or corporate bodies (recht persoon) (Jamilah, et al, 2020;Rahmadia, et al, 2020;Sembiring & Pujiyono, 2020). Hospitals can be said as legal subjects because they can be considered to support rights and obligations in conducting legal relations and can also be considered as legal entities, namely "corporations" where there are facilities and infrastructure as well as humans as medical personnel so that their position can be prosecuted both in civil, administrative and criminal law .…”

“…Although a person gains the trust of a delegate from his superiors and commits a crime, the authority grantor (corporation) must expect the occurrence of criminal liability because there is a link between the action and the scope of the corporate worker. That can be understood because the things (doings) entrusted by the employer (corporation) are things usually must be done by the employer but mandated to the workers (Jamilah et al, 2020;Muladi, 2010;Suhariyanto, 2018).…”

Mendorong Lahirnya RUU Keamanan Laut dalam Penguatan Sistem Keamanan Laut Nasional

“…Posisi Indonesia yang strategis berikut potensi kekayaan laut yang ada di dalamnya juga menjadi tantangan dengan tingkat kerawanan yang tinggi, yang dapat mengganggu stabilitas keamanan laut nasional dan menjadi sumber konflik regional (Jamilah, & Disemadi, 2020). Letak geografis Indonesia mengundang risiko terbukanya akses bagi negara lain untuk memasuki dan beraktivitas di wilayah laut Indonesia dan memunculkan alasan konflik teritorial dengan negara tetangga (Kurniasanti, & Setiyono, 2020).…”