2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2dd00057a
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Δ-machine learning approach for force fields, illustrated by a CCSD(T) 4-body correction to the MB-pol water potential

Abstract: ∆-Machine Learning (∆-ML) has been shown to effectively and efficiently bring a low-level ML potential energy surface to CCSD(T) quality. Here we propose extending this approach to general force fields,...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of V PIP 4B in models 4b and 4c significantly improves the descriptions of 4-body energies when compared to the original MB-pol PEF, which does not include a PIP 4-body term (model a). This behavior is consistent with ref .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The inclusion of V PIP 4B in models 4b and 4c significantly improves the descriptions of 4-body energies when compared to the original MB-pol PEF, which does not include a PIP 4-body term (model a). This behavior is consistent with ref .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They all have two-body terms, such as a Lennard-Jones or exp-6 potential. This general form immediately suggests the following expression for a many-body Δ correction: .25em V normalΔ‐ML + MB‐FF = V MB‐FF + prefix∑ i > j N normalΔ V 2‐b ( i , j ) + prefix∑ i > j > k N normalΔ V 3‐b ( i , j , k ) + prefix∑ i > j > k > l N normalΔ V 4‐b ( i , j , k , l ) + ··· where V MB‑FF is the force field and the Δ V n ‑b are the many-body corrections to the MB-FF many-body terms. These are given by the difference between CCSD(T) and MB-FF n -body ( n -b) interaction energies.…”
Section: δ-Machine Learning Polarizable Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using fourth-order 222111-symmetry PIPs, the fitting RMSE for the whole dataset is 9 cm –1 . For the Δ-ML 4-b correction potential, Δ V 4‑b , we employed the same PIP bases as described in q-AQUA 4-b and the Δ-ML 4-b to MB-pol using a dataset of 3692 tetramer energies computed at the CCSD­(T)-F12/haTZ level of theory. The fitting RMSE for this correction potential is 6.3 cm –1 .…”
Section: δ-Machine Learning Polarizable Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting basis is the same as described in q-AQUA 4-b and the ∆-ML 4-b to MB-pol; 33 briefly, it consists of 200 "super PIPs" of Morse variables; these super PIPS are formed from sums of regular PIPs so as to ensure invariance with respect to permutation of monomers. 32 The fitting RMS error for the whole data set is 6.3 cm −1 .…”
Section: Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%