2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ZVT–ZCT PWM synchronous buck converter with a simple passive auxiliary circuit for reduction of losses and efficiency enhancement

Abstract: In this paper, a Zero-Voltage-Transition (ZVT)-Zero-Current Transition (ZCT) Pulsewidth Modulated (PWM) synchronous buck converter (SBC), with a simple passive auxiliary circuit is proposed, which reduces the stresses and improves the efficiency by pacifying the conduction losses compared to a traditional PWM converter, typically suitable for photovoltaic applications. The important design feature of ZVT-ZCT PWM SBC converters is placement of resonant components that mollifies the conduction losses. Due to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper mainly introduces ZVT-PWM. The reason why the ZVT-PWM converter is adopted is that the ZVT converter can avoid the problem of excessive turn-off loss caused by diode reverse recovery and greatly improves conversion efficiency (Ismail and Sebzali, 1998;Jahdi et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper mainly introduces ZVT-PWM. The reason why the ZVT-PWM converter is adopted is that the ZVT converter can avoid the problem of excessive turn-off loss caused by diode reverse recovery and greatly improves conversion efficiency (Ismail and Sebzali, 1998;Jahdi et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prohibitive feature of such converters is hard commutation of switching devices, being a source of high losses as well as electromagnetic interference (EMI). The mitigation of hard switching shortcomings by introduction of various snubbing circuits to provide resonant switching transitions is not helpful due to added complexity and need for additional active elements to be commutated in the very same way (Pavlovic et al 2012;Shiva Kumar et al 2015;Bodur et al 2003;Akın 2014;Goryashin and Khoroshko 2011). The commutation itself becomes too long and quite often creates unwanted oscillations thus increasing safety margin required and limiting conversion frequency as well as regulation range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%