2012
DOI: 10.1080/00036811.2012.667081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A zero-sum electromagnetic evader–interrogator differential game with uncertainty

Abstract: We consider dynamic electromagnetic evasion-interrogation games in which the evader can use ferroelectric material coatings to attempt to avoid detection while the interrogator can manipulate the interrogating frequencies to enhance detection. The resulting problem is formulated as a two-player zero-sum dynamic differential game in which the cost functional is based on the expected value of the intensity of the reflected signal. We show that there exists a saddle point for the relaxed form of this dynamic diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative one could pose our problem as a two-player min-max noncooperative differential game such as used for electromagnetic interrogation/counter-interrogation in [6, 7]. In this case strategies or controls for under/over suppression would represent opposing “player” therapy strategies and one could seek formulations of the game (controls) that provide value (i.e., controls where the min-max=max-min— see [6] and the references therein) for the corresponding differential game. In this case one would find the “best” strategies for balancing virus suppression with organ acceptance.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative one could pose our problem as a two-player min-max noncooperative differential game such as used for electromagnetic interrogation/counter-interrogation in [6, 7]. In this case strategies or controls for under/over suppression would represent opposing “player” therapy strategies and one could seek formulations of the game (controls) that provide value (i.e., controls where the min-max=max-min— see [6] and the references therein) for the corresponding differential game. In this case one would find the “best” strategies for balancing virus suppression with organ acceptance.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential games in infinite dimensions have been investigated by Kocan, Soravia, and Świe ֒ ch [55], by Kocan and Soravia [54], by Shaiju [90], by Ghosh and Shaiju [41], by Ramaswamy and Shaiju [87], by Nowakowska and Nowakowski [81], by Świe ֒ ch [98], by Banks and Shuhua [3], and by Vlasenko, Rutkas, and Chikriȋ [106]. Stochastic differential games in infinite dimensions and the related Isaacs equations have been studied by Fleming and Nisio [37], by Nisio [74][75][76][77][78][79], and by Świe ֒ ch [97].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting problem is formulated as a two-player zero-sum dynamic differential game in which the cost functional is based on the expected value of the intensity of the reflected signal. In [29] we show that there exists a saddle point for the relaxed form of this dynamic differential game in which the relaxed controls appear bilinearly in the dynamics governed by a partial differential equation. We also have developed a computational framework for construction of approximate saddle point strategies in feedback form for a special case of this relaxed differential game with strategies and payoff in the sense of Berkovitz.…”
Section: Dynamic Evasion-interrogation Games With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report new progress [25], [29] on dynamic electromagnetic evasion-interrogation games in which the evader can use ferroelectric material coatings to attempt to avoid detection while the interrogator can manipulate the interrogating frequencies to enhance detection. The resulting problem is formulated as a two-player zero-sum dynamic differential game in which the cost functional is based on the expected value of the intensity of the reflected signal.…”
Section: Dynamic Evasion-interrogation Games With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%