2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A year-long trial of a square mesh panel in a commercial demersal trawl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier experiments with devices installed in the extension piece showed that the efficiency of the device depends largely on how close the device is to a catch accumu- Pagination not final (cite DOI) / Pagination provisoire (citer le DOI) lation zone such as the cod end (Bullough et al 2007;Herrmann et al 2014). Thus, devices that do not form, or have, an obstacle (i.e., lifting panel, guiding panel, sorting grid, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier experiments with devices installed in the extension piece showed that the efficiency of the device depends largely on how close the device is to a catch accumu- Pagination not final (cite DOI) / Pagination provisoire (citer le DOI) lation zone such as the cod end (Bullough et al 2007;Herrmann et al 2014). Thus, devices that do not form, or have, an obstacle (i.e., lifting panel, guiding panel, sorting grid, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent field experiments showed no significant effect of using square codend or square mesh panel on the selectivity of trawl codends (Bullough et al, 2006;He, 2006). The same conclusion has been shown by Erickson et al (1996), who found that no significant effect for the square mesh panel on the escapement of undersize walleye pollock as the catch size increases, and they recommended the use of sorting grids to permit escapement of undersized fish before they reach the codend of pelagic trawls, without restricting the catch limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Del mismo modo, Graham & Kynoch (2001) señalan que en paneles de escape la probabilidad de escape sería menor dada la dependencia que existe entre la proximidad del pez con el panel y el enmascaramiento visual al interior del copo. Aun cuando se reconoce este efecto, no hay duda que los paneles de malla cuadrada instalados adecuadamente en las redes de arrastre pueden reducir significativamente las capturas bajo talla (Madsen et al, 2002;Bullough et al, 2007). Esta bien establecido que en los artes de arrastre, la selección de los peces ocurre típicamente en el túnel y copo de la red, y es mayoritariamente una función de la relación entre su morfología y la disponibilidad de abertura de las mallas (Wileman et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified