2016
DOI: 10.17487/rfc8022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A YANG Data Model for Routing Management

Abstract: This document contains a specification of three YANG modules and one submodule. Together they form the core routing data model that serves as a framework for configuring and managing a routing subsystem. It is expected that these modules will be augmented by additional YANG modules defining data models for control-plane protocols, route filters, and other functions. The core routing data model provides common building blocks for such extensions --routes, Routing Information Bases (RIBs), and control-plane prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 introduces the related work to our solution by presenting per work: the reference itself, a brief description of the work, SDN plane in which the solution operates, modeling language used for specifying the management tasks, scope (interdomain vs. intradomain), and status (i.e., implementation: functional deployment in a real network, prototype: a development that serves as a proof of concept, and conceptual: nonimplementation/prototype). From the related work analysis, we remark several facts: first, there are a lot of solutions, such as, previous studies, 2,16,17,19,20,22,41,45–48 that consider YANG or CIM for network management, but few of them 2,16,17,22 operate in SDN. Second, some works 12,23–26,49,50 employ modeling or policy languages or formal notations for specifying their proposals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 introduces the related work to our solution by presenting per work: the reference itself, a brief description of the work, SDN plane in which the solution operates, modeling language used for specifying the management tasks, scope (interdomain vs. intradomain), and status (i.e., implementation: functional deployment in a real network, prototype: a development that serves as a proof of concept, and conceptual: nonimplementation/prototype). From the related work analysis, we remark several facts: first, there are a lot of solutions, such as, previous studies, 2,16,17,19,20,22,41,45–48 that consider YANG or CIM for network management, but few of them 2,16,17,22 operate in SDN. Second, some works 12,23–26,49,50 employ modeling or policy languages or formal notations for specifying their proposals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, some works 12,23–26,49,50 employ modeling or policy languages or formal notations for specifying their proposals. Third, the works 17–22 reflect the growing interest in using YANG to specify management solutions and protocols since it is natural for network management and Internet networking. Fourth, none of these works present a proposal that uses YANG to define the Data, Control, Application, and Vertical Management Planes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation