2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2016.2601115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Yagi–Uda Antenna With Load and Additional Reflector for Near-Field UHF RFID

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for [29], it has a very large reading area of 440 mm × 160 mm, and has used 17 dBm input power and therefore not suitable to be included and compared with the other reference antennas in Table 2 (as all reference antennas in Table 2 are using 30 dBm input power). Even though [29] was fed by a lower input power and has exhibited a maximum read range of 14 cm, while most of the tags (reading rate >95%) are successfully read at 10 mm, the full range read distance of [29] was too short or does not exist. In addition, the operation band of [29] was 880-980 MHz that cannot cover the ETSI band (865-868 MHz).…”
Section: Reading Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for [29], it has a very large reading area of 440 mm × 160 mm, and has used 17 dBm input power and therefore not suitable to be included and compared with the other reference antennas in Table 2 (as all reference antennas in Table 2 are using 30 dBm input power). Even though [29] was fed by a lower input power and has exhibited a maximum read range of 14 cm, while most of the tags (reading rate >95%) are successfully read at 10 mm, the full range read distance of [29] was too short or does not exist. In addition, the operation band of [29] was 880-980 MHz that cannot cover the ETSI band (865-868 MHz).…”
Section: Reading Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though [29] was fed by a lower input power and has exhibited a maximum read range of 14 cm, while most of the tags (reading rate >95%) are successfully read at 10 mm, the full range read distance of [29] was too short or does not exist. In addition, the operation band of [29] was 880-980 MHz that cannot cover the ETSI band (865-868 MHz).…”
Section: Reading Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present case, considering that the TO are small enough not to disturb the magnetic field created by the CBCPW line, the coupling coefficient ‫ܥ‬ ே depends on the frequency of operation, the distance between the central line and the tag, the missalignement between the tags and the line Hence, according to [3] [12],the magnitude of the magnetic field normal to the surface of the tag (referred to as ȁ‫ܪ‬ ௭ ȁ ) should be greater than the threshold value ‫ܪ‬ ௧ which is about -30 dBA/m for the Dash XXS by Xeraf, a passive UHF Class 1 Gen 2 tag [13]. It is equipped with the Alien Higgs-3 chip that has a typical sensitivity, ܲ ௧ , of -17dBm.…”
Section: General Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) near-field RFID technology received a lot of attention due to the promising opportunities in item-level RFID applications such as sensitive products tracking, pharmaceutical, logistics, transport and medical products [2]. Moreover, near-field systems allow a considerable size reduction of tags compare to those used in far-field systems, expending the range of applications of RFID to extremely small items [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yagi antennas are an appealing antennas for use in mobile devices, considering their stable gain versus frequency [1,2]. However, for operation at frequencies at the lower part of the ultra-high frequency (UHF) band, the size of a conventional Yagi antenna becomes too large for practical use [3,4]. The reason is that the driven element of a Yagi antenna is generally a half-wavelength dipole followed by directors and reflectors also with approximately quarter-wavelength separations [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%