1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8733-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A World of States of Affairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
269
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
269
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in The Philosophy of Logical Atomism Russell (1956) said that when he argued that there were negative facts, it nearly produced a riot (p. 211). Armstrong (1997) rejects both negative and disjunctive facts, but he does accept conjunctive facts and totality facts. Armstrong (1997) rejects both negative and disjunctive facts, but he does accept conjunctive facts and totality facts.…”
Section: Coalescence-free Refinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in The Philosophy of Logical Atomism Russell (1956) said that when he argued that there were negative facts, it nearly produced a riot (p. 211). Armstrong (1997) rejects both negative and disjunctive facts, but he does accept conjunctive facts and totality facts. Armstrong (1997) rejects both negative and disjunctive facts, but he does accept conjunctive facts and totality facts.…”
Section: Coalescence-free Refinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 For the notion of a truthmaker see, for example, Mulligan et al (1984), Armstrong (1997), Moltmann (2007), and Fine (2012). 25 For the notion of a truthmaker see, for example, Mulligan et al (1984), Armstrong (1997), Moltmann (2007), and Fine (2012).…”
Section: Type 2 Truth Predicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 His idea is that "while the step from constituents to states of affairs is a contingent one, all the further steps in the suggested regress follow necessarily.,,26 What he means is more clearly explained in an earlier publication where he describes the regress as follows. But he has a 'fall-back' position: even if an instantiation relation is admitted, the resulting regress is as harmless as the truth regress.…”
Section: Is the Exemplification Regress Benign? Armstrongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 Since aRb and bRa (the relation either non-symmetrical or asymmetrical) are different states of affairs that share all constituents, they differ only by being different states of affairs. In support of this one might adduce apparent cases in which two facts differ without differing in a constituent.…”
Section: The Instantiation Of Universals By Particulars Is Just the Smentioning
confidence: 99%