2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11573-017-0857-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A world of difference? The impact of corporate venture capitalists’ investment motivation on startup valuation

Abstract: Corporate venture capital (CVC) investors are regularly painted with the same brush, a fact underscored by the often observed belief in the extant literature that corporate venture capitalists (CVCs) form a homogeneous group. In contrast to this simplifying perspective, this paper categorizes CVCs into subgroups by examining their levels of strategic and financial investment motivation using computer-aided text analysis and cluster analysis. To validate the resulting clusters, this paper studies the impact of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, providing ventures with support to access complementary assets differentiates corporate investors from pure financial investors and can help ventures to commercialize their products or services (Paik and Woo 2017;Röhm et al 2018). In particular, there seems to be certain evidence that the level of innovativeness and the research intensity increases when corporate investors grant access to those complementary assets (Alvarez-Garrido and Dushnitsky 2016) which is in line with Kelly and Kim (2018) who find a positive relationship between general VC-backing and the growth in R&D expenditures and Park and Steensma (2013) who find that rates of innovation enhance in particular for ventures funded by corporate investors.…”
Section: Corporate Venture Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, providing ventures with support to access complementary assets differentiates corporate investors from pure financial investors and can help ventures to commercialize their products or services (Paik and Woo 2017;Röhm et al 2018). In particular, there seems to be certain evidence that the level of innovativeness and the research intensity increases when corporate investors grant access to those complementary assets (Alvarez-Garrido and Dushnitsky 2016) which is in line with Kelly and Kim (2018) who find a positive relationship between general VC-backing and the growth in R&D expenditures and Park and Steensma (2013) who find that rates of innovation enhance in particular for ventures funded by corporate investors.…”
Section: Corporate Venture Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is obviously no way to do so in an objective and completely reliable manner, however, to assess whether an entrepreneurial opportunity is interesting, it may help to think about these opportunities as a professional investor would. That investor might be a venture capital firm (Kollmann and Kuckertz 2010) or a unit investing in promising start-ups on behalf of a larger corporation (Roehm et al 2017). Such investors would look for opportunities:…”
Section: Box 83 Case Study Visioverdis: the Graviplantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В большинстве зарубежных работ используются категории «окружающая среда» и «социальный капитал». Во-вторых, для анализа нефинансовой информации применяется три словаря 1 [McKenny, Short, Payne, 2013;Brigham et al, 2014;Rohm et al, 2018], которые до этого не апробировались в отечественных исследованиях. Наконец, в-третьих, влияние посланий генеральных директоров и председателей совета директоров изучаются отдельно друг от друга, что позволяет проследить определенные различия между ними (в зарубежной литературе наибольшее распространение получил анализ посланий только генеральных директоров).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…В выборке представлены компании разных отраслей, что требует существенно разного объема текста для донесения информации до аудитории. Рассматривая содержательные характеристики текста, полезно проследить динамику среднего использования слов из трех выбранных словарей[McKenny, Short, Payne, 2013;Brigham et al, 2014;Rohm et al, 2018] в течение исследуемого периода (рис. 1, 2).Рассмотрим распределение частоты использования слов с позитивной и негативной окраской в посланиях руководства (рис.…”
unclassified