A Worksite Self-management Program for Workers with Chronic Health Conditions Improves Worker Engagement and Retention, but not Workplace Function

Abstract

Purpose An increasing number of workers in the US have chronic health conditions that limit their ability to work, and few worksite interventions have been tested to improve worker coping and problem solving at work. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a worksite-based health self-management program designed to improve workplace function among workers with chronic health conditions. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of a worksite self-management program (“Manage at Work”) (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01978392) for workers with chronic health conditions (N = 119; 82% female, ages 20–69). Most workers were recruited from the health care or light manufacturing industry sectors. Workers attended a 5-session, facilitated psychoeducational program using concepts of health self-management, self-efficacy, ergonomics, and communication. Changes on outcomes of work engagement, work limitation, job satisfaction, work fatigue, work self-efficacy, days absent, and turnover intention at 6-month follow-up were compared to wait-list controls. Results The most prevalent chronic health conditions were musculoskeletal pain, headaches, vision problems, gastrointestinal disorders, respiratory disorders, and mental health disorders. The self-management program showed greater improvement in work engagement and turnover intent at 6-month follow-up, but there was no evidence of a parallel reduction in perceived work limitation. Trends for improved outcomes of work self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and work fatigue in the intervention group did not reach statistical significance in a group x time interaction test. Conclusions Offering a worksite self-management program to workers with chronic health conditions may be a feasible and beneficial strategy to engage and retain skilled workers who are risking disability.Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01978392.

The biopsychosocial model of pain 40 years on: time for a reappraisal?

“…Linton et al 83 demonstrated that an injured worker's workplace supervisor can be trained in effective communication skills to facilitate the worker's RTW, similar to Palermo's 112 accounts of the work with parents of children in pain. More recently, Shaw et al 123 have also described a work-site health self-management intervention for workers with chronic health problems, including chronic MSK pain, and their employers in the United States. Although these approaches show promise and further trials are needed, they do illustrate potential opportunities for improving quality of life outcomes for people with chronic pain conditions when social or environmental contributors are identified and addressed as part of a treatment plan.…”

The Job Leeway Scale: Initial Evaluation of a Self-report Measure of Health-Related Flexibility and Latitude at Work

“…The nature of the intervention was a 10-session group educational workshop aimed at improving the pain and illness self-management strategies of workers, with a special focus on strategies that could be implemented during working hours. Group comparisons of intervention outcomes for the randomized trial have been published previously [ 21 ].…”

Chronic Health Conditions in the Workplace: Work Stressors and Supportive Supervision, Work Design, and Programs

“…Though less common, there are some promising individual-focused evidencebased interventions for workers with chronic health conditions to promote wellbeing and work ability. These include, for example, chronic disease self-management programs adapted to the workplace (e.g., the Live Healthy, Work Healthy program; Haynes et al, 2022); a worksite group self-management program for workers with chronic health conditions (i.e., the Manage at Work program; Shaw et al, 2022); and a virtual coaching program to improve work ability and alleviate burnout in workers with chronic health conditions (Beatty & McGonagle, 2016;McGonagle et al, 2014b).…”