2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A work function study of ultra-thin alumina formation on NiAl(110) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the relative work function changes of Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) upon Sm deposition at 300 K. The work function of the clean thin Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) film is measured to be 4.3 eV, in close agreement with the value reported for thin Al 2 O 3 formed on NiAl(110) (4.27 eV). 71 After the surface is covered with Sm, it can be seen clearly that the work function decreases very quickly with Sm coverage below 0.3 ML, followed by a slower decrease up to ∼3 ML, after which it reaches a relatively constant value of 1.7 eV below the value of the clean thin Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) film. This results in a final work function value of 2.6 eV.…”
Section: A Structure and Morphology Of Alumina Filmsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 7 shows the relative work function changes of Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) upon Sm deposition at 300 K. The work function of the clean thin Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) film is measured to be 4.3 eV, in close agreement with the value reported for thin Al 2 O 3 formed on NiAl(110) (4.27 eV). 71 After the surface is covered with Sm, it can be seen clearly that the work function decreases very quickly with Sm coverage below 0.3 ML, followed by a slower decrease up to ∼3 ML, after which it reaches a relatively constant value of 1.7 eV below the value of the clean thin Al 2 O 3 /Ni 3 Al(111) film. This results in a final work function value of 2.6 eV.…”
Section: A Structure and Morphology Of Alumina Filmsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The work function of sample B is higher than previous results obtained on alumina/NiAl(110) system (4.2 eV). [23] In the case of sample A, the WF value is even higher, which can be explained by different quality and morphology of the layer. The oxide layer on sample A is believed to be not continuous and its surface is not flat.…”
Section: Xps Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the COB model mentioned above [31], the critical distance d c ≈ √ 2q/W φ for charge transfer can be estimated, where q is the charge of the projectile ion and W φ is the work function of a metal surface. In our case, the effective work function can be estimated approximately 4 eV [35]. With this estimation, we can calculate the radius for electron capture and resulting neutralization fraction from the ratio between the capture radius and the capillary radius [36], 2d c /r ≈ 4.1%.…”
Section: Positive-ion Productionmentioning
confidence: 89%