2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-021-01446-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A window on mantle-derived magmas within the Central Andes: eruption style transitions at Cerro Overo maar and La Albóndiga lava dome, northern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous models claiming a progressive deepening of the explosion locus and, relevantly, the crater formation (Lorenz, 1986), recent experiment-based studies of maar eruption dynamics favor a vertical (with respect to the scaled depth (SD), an empirical ratio between depth and energy of the explosion; Goto et al, 2001) and lateral movement of explosions and suggest that pre-existing topography (Sweeney et al, 2018;Acocella, 2021) and substrata lithology are the main factors affecting maar formations (Graettinger et al, 2015;Valentine et al, 2017;Sweeney et al, 2018). These factors have been tested by an increasing number of field observations, mostly on mafic maars (Amin and Valentine, 2017;Chako-Tchamabé et al, 2020;De León-Barragán et al, 2020;Ureta et al, 2021), which are significantly more common as compared to their felsic counterparts (Graettinger, 2018). There is still less information on felsic maars due to the limited exposure (Borrero et al, 2017), and hence, their characteristics have been mostly adopted by tuff rings (Ross et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike previous models claiming a progressive deepening of the explosion locus and, relevantly, the crater formation (Lorenz, 1986), recent experiment-based studies of maar eruption dynamics favor a vertical (with respect to the scaled depth (SD), an empirical ratio between depth and energy of the explosion; Goto et al, 2001) and lateral movement of explosions and suggest that pre-existing topography (Sweeney et al, 2018;Acocella, 2021) and substrata lithology are the main factors affecting maar formations (Graettinger et al, 2015;Valentine et al, 2017;Sweeney et al, 2018). These factors have been tested by an increasing number of field observations, mostly on mafic maars (Amin and Valentine, 2017;Chako-Tchamabé et al, 2020;De León-Barragán et al, 2020;Ureta et al, 2021), which are significantly more common as compared to their felsic counterparts (Graettinger, 2018). There is still less information on felsic maars due to the limited exposure (Borrero et al, 2017), and hence, their characteristics have been mostly adopted by tuff rings (Ross et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, several ZVF maars are proceeded by cinder cones, denoting a shift in the eruption dynamics from strombolian to phreatomagmatic. This dynamic behavior of phreatomagmatic eruptions/ systems has been observed in several places around the world, including hyper-arid regions such as the Atacama Desert in Chile (Ureta et al, 2021a(Ureta et al, , 2021b. Ultimately, phreatomagmatic activity in these regions seems to be controlled by water availability and water table depth (Ureta et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Geomorphology and Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This dynamic behavior of phreatomagmatic eruptions/systems has been observed in several places around the world, including hyper-arid regions such as the Atacama Desert in Chile (Ureta et al, 2021a, Submitted to Geomorphology 2021b). Ultimately, phreatomagmatic activity in these regions seems to be controlled by water availability and water table depth (Ureta et al, 2021b). Submitted to Geomorphology…”
Section: Geomorphology and Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%