2012
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20123902002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A well-monitored, X-ray selected, tidal disruption event

Abstract: Abstract. We report on a candidate tidal disruption event detected in the XMM-Newton slew survey from the nucleus of SDSS J120136.02+300305.5 (z = 0.146; hereafter SDSS J1201+30). The source, monitored by Swift and XMM-Newton, was highly variable on timescales of a week, reaching a peak X-ray luminosity of 3 × 10 44 ergs/s. The light curve is reminiscent of the variations seen in SWIFT J1644+57, although in this case the absence of radio flux rules out a jet mechanism for the emission. The X-ray spectrum is st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hard excess produced by the Inverse Compton effect has a shape which is well approximated by a power-law with slope dependent on the temperature and optical depth of the electrons (see Nishimura et al 1986). This model provides a more physical fit to SDSS 1201+30 (Saxton et al 2012b) and has been used to fit the excess in XMM-Newton and Chandra spectra of TDEs such as 3XMM J150052.0+015452 (Lin et al 2017a). Two popular spectral models are (compbb; Nishimura et al 1986) and (comptt;Titarchuk 1994).…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard excess produced by the Inverse Compton effect has a shape which is well approximated by a power-law with slope dependent on the temperature and optical depth of the electrons (see Nishimura et al 1986). This model provides a more physical fit to SDSS 1201+30 (Saxton et al 2012b) and has been used to fit the excess in XMM-Newton and Chandra spectra of TDEs such as 3XMM J150052.0+015452 (Lin et al 2017a). Two popular spectral models are (compbb; Nishimura et al 1986) and (comptt;Titarchuk 1994).…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard excess produced by the Inverse Compton effect has a shape which is well approximated by a power-law with slope dependent on the temperature and optical depth of the electrons (see Nishimura et al 1986). This model provides a more physical fit to SDSS 1201+30 (Saxton et al 2012b) and has been used to fit the excess in XMM-Newton and Chandra spectra of TDEs such as 3XMM J150052.0+015452 (Lin et al 2017a). Two popular spectral models are (compbb; Nishimura et al 1986) and (comptt;Titarchuk 1994).…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the X-ray band, several new TDEs were identified with Chandra and XMM-Newton with peak luminosities up to a few times 10 44 erg s −1 and very soft X-ray spectra, located in quiescent host galaxies (e.g., Esquej et al 2008;Maksym et al 2010Maksym et al , 2013Saxton et al 2012b;Donato et al 2014;Lin et al 2015Lin et al , 2017Lin et al , 2022Li et al 2020). Since TDEs are rare events, and their properties like light curve and spectral evolution can vary, identification of each single new event is of great interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%