2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-010-9693-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Well in a ‘Target’ Stratum of a Two-Layered Formation: The Muskat–Riesenkampf Solution Revisited

Abstract: Explicit analytical solutions are obtained in terms of hydraulic head (pressure) and Darcian velocity for a steady Darcian flow to a point/line sink and array of sinks with refraction of streamlines on a horizontal interface between two layers of constant hydraulic conductivities. The sinks are placed in a 'target' layer between a constant potential plane and interface. An equipotential surface, encompassing the sink represents a horizontal or vertical well, is reconstructed as a quasi-cylinder or quasi-sphere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following mechanisms control the slug motion: gravity (drives the slug down), Darcian resistance (impedes flow), volumedistributed water suction by the roots, capillarity (through two air entrance constants on the two fronts) and accretion/evaporation on the drainage front. These mechanisms are incorporated into the model in a mathematical way, matching the EinsteinKalashnikov epigraph-dictum, and the Guenon concept of "unifying complexity" and limiting contours (Obnosov et al 2011), which in our case are the Green-Ampt fronts. A single-front Green-Ampt model involves hydraulic conductivity, air entrance pressure and effective porosity, while in our case SPF are tackled through five parameters (different porositiespressures at the two fronts).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following mechanisms control the slug motion: gravity (drives the slug down), Darcian resistance (impedes flow), volumedistributed water suction by the roots, capillarity (through two air entrance constants on the two fronts) and accretion/evaporation on the drainage front. These mechanisms are incorporated into the model in a mathematical way, matching the EinsteinKalashnikov epigraph-dictum, and the Guenon concept of "unifying complexity" and limiting contours (Obnosov et al 2011), which in our case are the Green-Ampt fronts. A single-front Green-Ampt model involves hydraulic conductivity, air entrance pressure and effective porosity, while in our case SPF are tackled through five parameters (different porositiespressures at the two fronts).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we get an infinite series, similarly to Obnosov et al . () for the Laplace equation: lefttrueθ=θ1D+QexpZ8πexprrexpr1r1expr2r2+expr3r3+expr4r4,r2=ρ2+()Z+2ts2,r3=ρ2+()Z+2a+2ts2,r4=ρ2+()Z2a2ts2, …”
Section: Philip's Point Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical solutions to potential field problems, where the intricate topology of 2D flow nets is controlled by internal heterogeneities of the domain, but the boundary conditions are uniform or follow from the symmetry principle in cases of internal heat sources/sinks, have recently been obtained [6,[9][10][11][12]. In these cases, an elementary cell, where the potential problems were solved, represents a flow tube, which consists of two isotherms and two adiabatic lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%