2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9711-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weighted hidden Markov model approach for continuous-state tool wear monitoring and tool life prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cutting force, which is originated by the shearing of the material, friction between the chip and the cutter and so on, can convey key information on the conditions of machining processes. The cutting forces can reflect the machinability of the material [ 1 , 2 ] or used to identify machining malfunctions, such as machining vibrations [ 3 , 4 ] or tool wear [ 5 ]. Therefore, measuring cutting forces in the machining process is fundamental for condition monitoring and process optimization [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutting force, which is originated by the shearing of the material, friction between the chip and the cutter and so on, can convey key information on the conditions of machining processes. The cutting forces can reflect the machinability of the material [ 1 , 2 ] or used to identify machining malfunctions, such as machining vibrations [ 3 , 4 ] or tool wear [ 5 ]. Therefore, measuring cutting forces in the machining process is fundamental for condition monitoring and process optimization [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have applied ANNs and HMMs to TCM in milling processes with outstanding results [33], [51], [52]. Deep neural networks such as CNNs [53], [54] and RNNs [55], [56] have also been applied with considerable success.…”
Section: B Monitoring Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the mean wear depth is necessary to determine the intensity of the Markov process as equation (21). In the above section, the average wear depth is calculated by an estimate of the 50th percentile of the measured growth rate distribution.…”
Section: Wear Depth Growth Rate Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%