2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2943076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weighted Deep Domain Adaptation Method for Industrial Fault Prognostics According to Prior Distribution of Complex Working Conditions

Abstract: In modern industrial engineered systems, variant working conditions disturb the distributions of machines' operational data, which results in different feature distributions (DFD) problems for fault prognostics. Domain adaptation (DA) have been proved good at dealing DFD problems, and several deep DA-based methods have been also proposed in fault prognostics filed. However, existing methods refer to the DA tasks from one working condition to another, without considerations of transferring between datasets unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method was compared with other existing RUL estimation methods, which are HDNN [31], CNN-LSTM [32], The best result of each column is red and the second-best result is blue. [33], DCNN [15], BLSTM-ED [21], and LSTM-BS [34].…”
Section: ) Comparison With State-of-the-arts Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method was compared with other existing RUL estimation methods, which are HDNN [31], CNN-LSTM [32], The best result of each column is red and the second-best result is blue. [33], DCNN [15], BLSTM-ED [21], and LSTM-BS [34].…”
Section: ) Comparison With State-of-the-arts Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN and LSTM can be cascaded in a sequential manner, e.g., CNN-LSTM [34] put CNN in the first stage, while BLCNN [21] reversed the order. In addition, HDNN [20] combined both the features from CNN and LSTM to generate the final predictions.…”
Section: A Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsupervised domain adaptation focuses on minimizing the domain discrepancy and learning the feature representation that can map the source and target data into the same feature space. These works assume the existence of sufficiently labeled source data and unlabeled target data 34–40 . The widely discussed domain adaptation schemes mainly include maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) minimization 36–38 and adversarial training 39,40 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works assume the existence of sufficiently labeled source data and unlabeled target data. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] The widely discussed domain adaptation schemes mainly include maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) minimization [36][37][38] and adversarial training. 39,40 Yang et al 38 proposed a deep multi-layer domain adaptation network with MMD minimization for health monitoring and diagnosis of bearings used in real-case machines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%