Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web 2002
DOI: 10.1145/511446.511529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A web middleware architecture for dynamic customization of content for wireless clients

Abstract: We present a new Web middleware architecture that allows users to customize their view of the Web for optimal interaction and system operation when using non-traditional resource-limited client machines such as wireless PDAs (personal digital assistants). Web Stream Customizers (WSC) are dynamically deployable software modules and can be strategically located between client and server to achieve improvements i n performance, reliability, or security. An important design feature is that Customizers provide two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This framework focuses on filtering applications instead of all types of applications that could benefit from mobile code. A more flexible Web-oriented customization scheme is detailed in [14], which describes the implementation of a middleware architecture that supports adaptive Web-based proxies called Customizers. Customizers tend to be deployed on behalf of a client, and are split into two points of control, so as to separate the individual extension of a Web browser from its remote, location-dependent computation.…”
Section: Client-based Customizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework focuses on filtering applications instead of all types of applications that could benefit from mobile code. A more flexible Web-oriented customization scheme is detailed in [14], which describes the implementation of a middleware architecture that supports adaptive Web-based proxies called Customizers. Customizers tend to be deployed on behalf of a client, and are split into two points of control, so as to separate the individual extension of a Web browser from its remote, location-dependent computation.…”
Section: Client-based Customizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been a lot of research on optimizing dynamic and personalized Web content, including dynamic data caching [1][1] [14][27] [7] and content adaptation [5][28] [22]. However, their approaches do not support disconnected computing because they do not cache, replicate or adapt service objects at the client side.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional means of optimizing dynamic Web content generation and delivery are not well suited to the nature of unstable wireless connectivity. When a wireless client loses connection (either voluntarily or involuntarily) or roams into an area with weak connectivity, common optimization techniques, including static page prefetching [3], dynamic content caching [6] [18], and content adaptation [5][28] [22] as well as application offloading, will fail to maintain effective interactive operations (e.g., querying account information, filling survey forms, checking product inventory) as they do not eliminate the need to go through the wireless connection for dynamically generated content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike our work, this framework focuses on filtering applications instead of all types of applications that could benefit from mobile code. A more flexible Web-oriented customization scheme is detailed in [19], which describes the implementation of a middleware architecture that supports adaptive Web-based proxies called Customizers. Customizers tend to be deployed on behalf of a client, and are split into two points of control, so as to separate the individual extension of a Web browser from its remote, location-dependent computation.…”
Section: Client-based Customizersmentioning
confidence: 99%