DOI: 10.22215/etd/2013-06551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A web-based perinatal decision support system framework using a knowledge-based-approach to estimate clinical outcomes : neonatal mortality and preterm birth in twins pregnancies

Abstract: The author has granted a non exclusive license allowing Library and Archives Canada to reproduce, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, communicate to the public by telecommunication or on the Internet, loan, distrbute and sell theses worldwide, for commercial or non commercial purposes, in microform, paper, electronic and/or any other formats. AVIS: L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All sensitivity and specificity values showed a near perfect performance. To be considered as clinically useful a Sensitivity of 65% and Specificity of 85% must be met as recommended by our clinician partner, reported by Gunaratnam (2013). Collectively these values meet and surpass the performance measures reported.…”
Section: Ann Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All sensitivity and specificity values showed a near perfect performance. To be considered as clinically useful a Sensitivity of 65% and Specificity of 85% must be met as recommended by our clinician partner, reported by Gunaratnam (2013). Collectively these values meet and surpass the performance measures reported.…”
Section: Ann Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For the BORN verification sets, the outcomes of results from both methods for each set were similar to one another (with Method 2 performing only slightly better than Method 1 overall). To be considered as clinically useful a Sensitivity of 65% and Specificity of 85% must be met as recommended by our clinician partner, reported by Gunaratnam (2013). The specificity values do meet the requirement, however, collectively these values do not meet the performance measures reported.…”
Section: Hold Out Verification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations