Objective
This study describes the primary data sources, data elements, and validation methods currently used in electronic surveillance systems (ESS) for identification and surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and compares these data elements and validation methods with recommended standards.
Methods
Using PRISMA guidelines, a PubMed and manual search was conducted to identify research articles describing ESS for identification and surveillance of HAIs published from January 1, 2009 through August 31, 2014. Selected articles were evaluated to determine what data elements and validation methods were included.
Results
Among the 509 articles identified in the original literature search, 30 met the inclusion criteria. While the majority of studies (83%) used recommended data sources and validated the numerator (80%), only 10 percent of studies performed external and internal validation. In addition, there was variation in ESS data formats used.
Conclusions
The findings of this review suggest that the majority of ESS for HAI surveillance are using standard definitions, but the lack of widespread internal data, denominator, and external validation in these systems reduces the reliability of their findings. Additionally, advanced programming skills are required to create, implement and maintain these systems and to reduce the variability in data formats.