2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0698-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Indoor Tanning Motivations in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Youthful indoor tanning as few as ten sessions can increase the risk of melanoma by 2 to 4 times with each additional session adding another 2% to the risk. Recent research estimates that indoor tanning can be linked to approximately 450,000 cases of skin cancer annually in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Despite these risks, indoor tanning remains popular with adolescents. This study tested the efficacy of a web-based skin cancer prevention intervention designed to reduce indoor tanning motivations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen studies (Chait et al . ; Cooper, Goldenberg, & Arndt, ; Cornelis et al ., ; Heckman, Handorf, Darlow, Ritterband, & Manne, ; Hevey et al ., ; Hillhouse et al ., , ; Jackson & Aiken, ; Mahler, Beckerley, et al ., ; Mahler, Kulik, et al ., ; Owen et al ., ; Stapleton et al ., , ; Williams et al., ) examined the effectiveness of interventions not classed as either of the above on a combination of all of the outcome variables, as well as sun protection intentions, UV exposure, and UV exposure intentions separately. For the effects of these interventions on the above outcome variables, the combined effect size was small, r + = .191; k = 14, N = 3,895, 95% CI = 0.117–0.265, p < .001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen studies (Chait et al . ; Cooper, Goldenberg, & Arndt, ; Cornelis et al ., ; Heckman, Handorf, Darlow, Ritterband, & Manne, ; Hevey et al ., ; Hillhouse et al ., , ; Jackson & Aiken, ; Mahler, Beckerley, et al ., ; Mahler, Kulik, et al ., ; Owen et al ., ; Stapleton et al ., , ; Williams et al., ) examined the effectiveness of interventions not classed as either of the above on a combination of all of the outcome variables, as well as sun protection intentions, UV exposure, and UV exposure intentions separately. For the effects of these interventions on the above outcome variables, the combined effect size was small, r + = .191; k = 14, N = 3,895, 95% CI = 0.117–0.265, p < .001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unhealthy behavior with respect to UV exposure is mostly initiated in early adolescence [ 36 ], commonly with the belief that a tan increases attractiveness [ 26 , 37 , 38 ], and the problems related to melanoma and skin atrophy are too far in the future for them to fathom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unhealthy behavior with respect to UV exposure is mostly initiated in early adolescence [42], commonly with the belief that a tan increases attractiveness [43][44][45] and the problems related to melanoma as well as skin atrophy are too far in the future to fathom.…”
Section: Current Knowledge On School-based Skin Cancer Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this association, various recent experimental studies to test these effects in young target groups aimed at promoting sunscreen use as an end point [19][20][21][22], and others used various UV protection behaviors (including avoiding sunbeds) or behavior scores [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Given the substantial amount of time that children and adolescents of all social backgrounds spend in the school environment, addressing skin cancer prevention in this setting is crucial and provides a unique opportunity to propel skin cancer prevention programs [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%