2012
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Web-Based Intervention to Improve and Prevent Low Back Pain Among Office Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) the study population included pregnant women or patients recovering after spinal surgery; or (3) email had been used as an intervention for office workers in the workplace. The latter criterion was based on previous studies [17][18][19][20] indicating a consistently high degree of patient compliance. We believe that the specific combination of being an office worker and receiving email at the workplace conveys a highly sensitive nature of the feedback, resulting in high patient compliance.…”
Section: Study Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) the study population included pregnant women or patients recovering after spinal surgery; or (3) email had been used as an intervention for office workers in the workplace. The latter criterion was based on previous studies [17][18][19][20] indicating a consistently high degree of patient compliance. We believe that the specific combination of being an office worker and receiving email at the workplace conveys a highly sensitive nature of the feedback, resulting in high patient compliance.…”
Section: Study Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 22 papers identified (Figure 1), 3 papers were published in 1 study [23][24][25], whereas another study published 2 papers [18,19]. Although the study population and intervention were the same in Del Pozo et al's [23][24][25], Calner et al's, and Nordin et al's [18,19] papers, different outcomes were reported in each publication. Therefore, for the quality assessment, each of these papers was assessed individually using the designated assessment tool.…”
Section: Description Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for data extraction, the 3 Del Pozo et al's papers [23][24][25], and the Calner et al and Nordin et al's [18,19] papers, have been combined to avoid duplication of the participant outcomes, thus leaving 19 individual studies included in the data extraction and results tables (Table 1, and Multimedia Appendices 2, and 4). Of the 19 included studies, most were from the United States (n=8) [14,20,22,[26][27][28][29]32]; 3 were from Australia [6,15,31]; 3 were from the Netherlands [16,30,34]; 2 were from Sweden [17][18][19]; and 1 each from Spain [23][24][25], Germany [33], and India [21]. One study was published in 2003 [34]; otherwise, all other studies were published between 2010 and 2019.…”
Section: Description Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, we constituted an advisory committee comprising TKM rehabilitation experts and the principal investigators from each site for finalizing the target population. Consequently, we obtained information on the occupation of the study population, which are as follows: blue collar workers, [11] hospital workers, [12] office worker, [13] and transit workers [14] (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%