2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-006-9004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A web-based e-learning system for increasing study efficiency by stimulating learner’s motivation

Abstract: Due to the opportunities provided by the Internet, more and more people are taking advantage of distance learning courses and during the last few years enormous research efforts have been dedicated to the development of distance learning systems. So far, many e-learning systems are proposed and used practically. However, in these systems the e-learning completion rate is about 30%. One of the reasons is the low study desire when the learner studies the learning materials. In this research, we propose an intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, given the intricacy involved in students' e-learning activities, factors such as students' learning styles, nature of the studied subject, motivation (Durresi and de Marco, 2006;Pudichery, 2003;Matsuo et al 2008), fluid intelligence (Barton, 1999), working memory (van Merrienboer and Ayres, 2005;Medina, 2008), spatial ability (Hannafin, et al 2008;Duesbury and O'Neil, 1996), and instructors' teaching philosophy may all potentially account for the variance of learner's satisfaction of using e-learning tools. Instead of measuring learning outcome as perceived grade increment after using an e-learning tool, future studies should also consider actual learning performance as more objective measure (Alavi, Yoo, & Vogel, 1997;Leidner & Fuller, 1997;Piccoli et al, 2001;Vogel, Davison, & Shroff, 2001).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given the intricacy involved in students' e-learning activities, factors such as students' learning styles, nature of the studied subject, motivation (Durresi and de Marco, 2006;Pudichery, 2003;Matsuo et al 2008), fluid intelligence (Barton, 1999), working memory (van Merrienboer and Ayres, 2005;Medina, 2008), spatial ability (Hannafin, et al 2008;Duesbury and O'Neil, 1996), and instructors' teaching philosophy may all potentially account for the variance of learner's satisfaction of using e-learning tools. Instead of measuring learning outcome as perceived grade increment after using an e-learning tool, future studies should also consider actual learning performance as more objective measure (Alavi, Yoo, & Vogel, 1997;Leidner & Fuller, 1997;Piccoli et al, 2001;Vogel, Davison, & Shroff, 2001).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to offer a suitable and efficient study for learners, in our previous work [10], we proposed a Web-based distance learning system in order to increase learner's efficiency. The proposed system has three subsystems: learning subsystem, learner supporting subsystem and teacher supporting subsystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is very important to stimulate learner's motivation during the study. In our previous works [16,17], we proposed an agent based distance learning system to deliver appropriate studying materials to learners and stimulate learner's motivation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%