2021
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2019.2924984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wearable Ultrasound System for Sensing Muscular Morphological Deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The angle between the upper arm and the forearm was about 120 • . Eight A-mode ultrasound transducers (Ø 9 × 11 mm) were placed around the forearm with a customized armband [20], approximately 10 cm distal to the elbow. The positions of transducers are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Offline Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The angle between the upper arm and the forearm was about 120 • . Eight A-mode ultrasound transducers (Ø 9 × 11 mm) were placed around the forearm with a customized armband [20], approximately 10 cm distal to the elbow. The positions of transducers are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Offline Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, where the distance between channel 1 and channel 8 was a little larger and the others were equidistant. The transducers were sequentially driven by a customized wearable ultrasound system [20], with a frame rate of 10 Hz, a sampling rate of 20 MHz, and sampling dots of 1000 for each channel. In addition, a commercial inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor (Xsens-MTi-100, Xsens Technologies B.V., Netherlands) was attached on the ventral side of the wrist to record the wrist rotation angle, sampling at 100 Hz.…”
Section: B Offline Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high spatial specificity means that muscular cross-talk does not contaminate the extracted control signals that can be used to drive movement of a prosthesis. Numerous studies have established SMG as a viable option for gesture recognition and prosthesis control [23][24][25][26]. In particular, our group has demonstrated the ability to classify five individual digit movements with 97% accuracy [27] and 15 complex grasps with 91% accuracy [28] in able-bodied individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As a result, cross-talk is effectively suppressed and the control signals derived from the detected muscle activity have a high signal-to-noise ratio. Prior studies have demonstrated clear potential for the use of SMG in controlling a prosthesis or other humanmachine interface (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40). Our own work has shown that SMG is capable of accurately classifying motor intent for able-bodied individuals (41,42) and individuals with upper limb loss (43,44) in both offline and real-time settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%