2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2011.2161486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wearable Real-Time Intelligent Posture Corrective System Using Vibrotactile Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haggerty et al [36] found that older adults could use a high fidelity laboratory-based system (Xsens MTx and C-2 tactor) to increase the percentage of time inside the no feedback zone from 65% to 90%. While the presented system increased the percentage of time inside the no feedback zone in a way that was similar and consistent with previous work, the extend of this increase was not as pronounced as other high fidelity systems [28], likely because of the lower fidelity sensors, lower sampling and algorithm update rates, and longer spin-up time of the flat eccentric vibrotactile feedback motor (resulting in longer delays as compared to linear actuators [29]) in the presented system as compared with high fidelity systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haggerty et al [36] found that older adults could use a high fidelity laboratory-based system (Xsens MTx and C-2 tactor) to increase the percentage of time inside the no feedback zone from 65% to 90%. While the presented system increased the percentage of time inside the no feedback zone in a way that was similar and consistent with previous work, the extend of this increase was not as pronounced as other high fidelity systems [28], likely because of the lower fidelity sensors, lower sampling and algorithm update rates, and longer spin-up time of the flat eccentric vibrotactile feedback motor (resulting in longer delays as compared to linear actuators [29]) in the presented system as compared with high fidelity systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, a cell phone based sensory feedback system has been designed for balance rehabilitation training, where trunk tilt was measured via a single smartphone accelerometer and tactors plugged into the smartphone audio jack provided vibrotactile feedback cues [27]. Similarly, a wearable real-time posture corrective system was designed to integrate vibrotactile feedback with a wobble board system to improve posture control by enhancing ankle proprioception [28]. In addition, many rehabilitation applications involve correcting or restoring gait patterns [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters are defined according to Denavit-Hartenberg convention, forward kinematics equations were derived, and an unscented Kalman filter has been deployed to estimate the defined parameters. The potential of incorporating a realtime biofeedback system with artificial intelligence for wobble board training, aimed at improving ankle proprioception has been reported [65]. The biofeedback system depended on Euler angular measurements of trunk and wobble board displacements and a fuzzy inference system was used to determine the quality of postural control.…”
Section: Types Of Activity Monitoring and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study used feedback equipment with vibrating and alarming for sitting postural correction [5]. The other study used anterior VF interface for motor learning [11]. These 3 studies said that feedback is highly effective in postural correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%