2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weakly supervised tooth‐mark and crack detection method in tongue image

Abstract: Tongue diagnosis is one of the primary clinical diagnostic methods in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Recognizing the tooth-marked tongue and the crackled tongue plays an essential role in evaluating the status of patients. Previous methods mainly focus on identifying whether a tongue image is a tooth-marked tongue (cracked tongue)or not, while cannot provide more details. In this study, we propose a weakly supervised method for training the tooth-mark and crack detection model by leveraging fully bounding-box l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the results of accuracy in the validation do not increase, the training is stopped. The loss function for Faster R-CNN sums the classification loss and regression loss, as defined in the following equation [ 24 ]: where N cls and N reg are the number of anchors in minibatch and number of anchor locations, λ and i mean the selected anchor box index and the balancing parameter; p i and p i ∗ represent the predicted probability and the ground truth of tongue feature; t i and t i ∗ represent the predicted bounding box and actual tongue feature label box. The accuracy results and the loss changes in the training are depicted in Figure 4(b) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the results of accuracy in the validation do not increase, the training is stopped. The loss function for Faster R-CNN sums the classification loss and regression loss, as defined in the following equation [ 24 ]: where N cls and N reg are the number of anchors in minibatch and number of anchor locations, λ and i mean the selected anchor box index and the balancing parameter; p i and p i ∗ represent the predicted probability and the ground truth of tongue feature; t i and t i ∗ represent the predicted bounding box and actual tongue feature label box. The accuracy results and the loss changes in the training are depicted in Figure 4(b) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the results of accuracy in the validation do not increase, the training is stopped. e loss function for Faster R-CNN sums the classification loss and regression loss, as defined in the following equation [24]:…”
Section: Model Training Validation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al 7 proposed a new method using statistic feature extracted by wide line, such as Max-distance, to train a binary SVM as a classifier for cracked tongue. And now more deep learning methods are used for crack defection based on classification, pixel segmentation and object detection [8][9][10] 11 proposed to train the tooth-mark and crack detection model by using tongue images annotated boundingbox. It was a weakly supervised method that added several classification branches to recognize the tooth-marked tongue and cracked tongue according to the YOLO object detection model.…”
Section: Tongue Crack Recognition Using Segmentation Based Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires a lot of image annotation including tongue landmark annotation and tongue region annotation, which is a huge burden and tedious work for clinic. Weng et al (2021) proposed a weakly supervised tooth-mark detection method using the YOLO object detection model. However, it requires fully bounding-box level annotation of tooth marks in addition to coarse image-level annotation of tooth-marked tongue images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%