1993
DOI: 10.1137/0614053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weakly Stable Algorithm for Padé Approximants and the Inversion of Hankel Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of them is exactly a generalization of either the Schur or the Levinson algorithm in the sense that it reduces to one of these classical algorithms in the absence of look-ahead steps. The underlying idea for the methods in [19] is analogous to the one of Cabay and Meleshko's weakly stable diagonal Padé recurrences and the corresponding look-ahead Hankel solver [8,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of them is exactly a generalization of either the Schur or the Levinson algorithm in the sense that it reduces to one of these classical algorithms in the absence of look-ahead steps. The underlying idea for the methods in [19] is analogous to the one of Cabay and Meleshko's weakly stable diagonal Padé recurrences and the corresponding look-ahead Hankel solver [8,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Cabay and Meleshko [4] have proposed an algorithm for stably generating Pad6 approximants. As a by-product, their procedure can also be used to invert general Hankel matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some exact as well as numeric algorithms, ω is selected as a random p-th root of unity. Then by the theory of early termination of that algorithm [18], the first t × t leading principle submatrix H [t] in the (infinite) Hankel matrix H with entries in row i and column j, Cabay and Meleshko gave an algorithm to bound from above the condition numbers of all the principal submatrices of the associated Hankel system in the well-conditioned case [8], which has been further refined and extended, for example, see [1,6]. Here we focus less on stably computing the Gohberg-Semencul updates (see those cited papers-we require no look-ahead), but on fast and accurate lower and upper bounds of the condition numbers, which constitute the early termination criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%