2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2005.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weaker regularity condition for subdifferential calculus and Fenchel duality in infinite dimensional spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a subset U of X , by cl U we denote its closure in the corresponding topology, while its indicator function δ U : X → R = R ∪ {±∞} and respectively support function σ U : X * → R are defined as follows: We define in the following a notion that extends the one of a closed set, needed for being able to provide generalized closedness type characterizations via epigraphs for ε-duality gap statements, extending thus the investigations begun in [11,12] and continued later in many works such as [2, 5-9, 13, 15-17]. Note that the notion of an ε-closed set was considered in the literature in different instances that have nothing in common with our research, see for instance [1,14], while in [18,Definition 3.2] one can find the definition of a vertically closed set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a subset U of X , by cl U we denote its closure in the corresponding topology, while its indicator function δ U : X → R = R ∪ {±∞} and respectively support function σ U : X * → R are defined as follows: We define in the following a notion that extends the one of a closed set, needed for being able to provide generalized closedness type characterizations via epigraphs for ε-duality gap statements, extending thus the investigations begun in [11,12] and continued later in many works such as [2, 5-9, 13, 15-17]. Note that the notion of an ε-closed set was considered in the literature in different instances that have nothing in common with our research, see for instance [1,14], while in [18,Definition 3.2] one can find the definition of a vertically closed set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the convex setting with finite dimensional space, background information on Fenchel duality is due to Rockafellar [26,27]. With infinite dimensional space, we refer for instance to [5,7,11,23,17].…”
Section: Proof (I) ⇒ (Iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can find conditions involving the continuity of one of the two functions at a point of dom f ∩ dom g, and some classical generalized interior point ones [1,14,28]. Recently, it has been introduced regularity conditions involving lower semicontinuity of the two functions, named closedness-type regularity conditions [5,6], which are not comparable with the most recent point-interior ones in the infinite dimensional setting (see [2]). In the e-convex context, the conditions obtained in this paper for the fulfilment of strong Fenchel duality can be regarded as the closedness-type ones in the classical convex setting, hence the problem of obtaining interiority-type conditions and the comparison of both type is a very interesting problem to work on in a future paper.…”
Section: Proof (I) ⇒ (Iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following notion of Cartesian product map is used in [7]: Definition 2. For the whole paper, we endow X * × R with the product topology of w * (X * , X) and the usual Euclidean topology.…”
Section: G(z) + H(x − Z) Note That If G H Is Exact At X Then (G H)(mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part (i) is a consequence of the RockafellarMoreau theorem (cf. [18,20]), and as in [7 3. New regularity conditions.…”
Section: G(z) + H(x − Z) Note That If G H Is Exact At X Then (G H)(mentioning
confidence: 99%