Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04068-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Weak Solvability of the Navier-Stokes Equation with Navier’s Boundary Condition Around a Ball Striking theWall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-slip condition prescribes the adherence of fluid particles to the solid boundaries and, as a consequence of a regularity of the fluid velocity, permits the creation of fine boundary layer that does not allow the contact of the solids.Another method for coupling of the fluid and of the bodies admits the slippage of fluid particles at the boundaries, which is described by Navier's boundary condition. The first step in this direction of the study of Navier's condition was done by Neustupa, Penel [22], [23], who demonstrate that the collision with a wall can occur for a prescribed movement of a solid ball, when the slippage was allowed on both boundaries. We refer for a discussion of Navier's boundary condition to Introduction of [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-slip condition prescribes the adherence of fluid particles to the solid boundaries and, as a consequence of a regularity of the fluid velocity, permits the creation of fine boundary layer that does not allow the contact of the solids.Another method for coupling of the fluid and of the bodies admits the slippage of fluid particles at the boundaries, which is described by Navier's boundary condition. The first step in this direction of the study of Navier's condition was done by Neustupa, Penel [22], [23], who demonstrate that the collision with a wall can occur for a prescribed movement of a solid ball, when the slippage was allowed on both boundaries. We refer for a discussion of Navier's boundary condition to Introduction of [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition of a guarantees that a is divergence-free. The validity of (3) as well as conditions (a1)-(a5) crucially depends on the form and properties of the function w. The details can be found in our paper [6]. It is important to mention that the validity of (a4), namely inequality (7), leads to the restriction, that |δ t | is "sufficiently small" in comparison with coefficients ν and γ for t in a certain neighbourhood of the instant of collision t c .…”
Section: Example: the Flow Around Two Striking Bodies With Ball-shapementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to the considered situation, when bodies B t 1 and B t 2 strike with ball-like surfaces, we also discuss the case of more general front surfaces of B t 1 and B t 2 in paper [6]. We give a hint how to construct the auxiliary function a.…”
Section: Example: the Flow Around Two Striking Bodies With Ball-shapementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The investigation of incompressible fluids in time dependent domains started with a seminal paper of Ladyzhenskaya [20], Fujita et al [15], see also [24,25,26,29] for more recent results in this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%