Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engi
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2002.1134407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wavelet based de-noising technique for ocular artifact correction of the electroencephalogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this comparison test, three very bad contaminated EEG channels (from data set 2) were acquired from C3, C4 and Cz as a reference according to the International 10-20 System. Since the most denoising methods in the literature are mainly based only on WT [29], Principle Component Analysis (PCA) [30] Since the amplitude and spectrum of EEG vary from signal to signal, subject to subject, it even varies from time to time for the same subject [32]. Also, the "rhythmic" behavior of EEG is characterized by a peak in the power spectrum at specific frequencies [33], could be used to study such changes of the signal after applying our method.…”
Section: Fig 4: Refinement Of Very Bad Signals By Iterating the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this comparison test, three very bad contaminated EEG channels (from data set 2) were acquired from C3, C4 and Cz as a reference according to the International 10-20 System. Since the most denoising methods in the literature are mainly based only on WT [29], Principle Component Analysis (PCA) [30] Since the amplitude and spectrum of EEG vary from signal to signal, subject to subject, it even varies from time to time for the same subject [32]. Also, the "rhythmic" behavior of EEG is characterized by a peak in the power spectrum at specific frequencies [33], could be used to study such changes of the signal after applying our method.…”
Section: Fig 4: Refinement Of Very Bad Signals By Iterating the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the signals must therefore present a true and clear picture about brain activities, the importance of artifact removal comes to be very needful and urgent to overcome the difficulties of traditional EEG examination. Up to now, the most techniques have been proposed for removing artifacts can be classified into; Regression based method (AR) [4], Adaptive Filters [5], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [6], Independent Component Analysis (ICA) [7], and Wavelet Transform (WT) [8]. Although these presented methods are practiced, each of them not only was designed to remove one particular artifact with its own limitations, but ruefully also considerable information of the true EEG can be lost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coiflet 3 wavelet (coif3) filter has been chosen, since the shape of its mother wavelet resembles the shape of the eye blink artifact [4]. According to [3], [12], the statistical threshold T with hard thresholding function would be better, T as follows:…”
Section: Threshold and Thresholding Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But sometimes, vertical eye movement artifacts seem to produce a rise in the higher frequencies [4]. Therefore, we applied threshold denoising in bands with frequency between 0-16Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the advantages of ICA, potentially laborious manual identification of components to be removed is still needed to obtain a reliable result. Instead of exploiting time values of frequency spectra, (Zikov et al 2002) demonstrated wavelet joint timefrequency representations to be useful for EEG ocular artifact denoising. Using appropriate normalization, the so-called 'z-score' can enhance the precision of wavelet time-frequency maps, resulting in efficient artifact detection (Browne and Cutmore 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%