IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2016
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2016.7524453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A walk on the client side: Monitoring enterprise Wifi networks using smartphone channel scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (right) bar chart shows the distribution of observed APs in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency band respectively. APs of 5 GHz dominates the observations with smallest and largest appearance frequency, which reveals that 5 GHz channels may be less crowded and weak signals in 5 GHz are more likely to be observed than that in 2.4 GHz [22]. Through empirical investigation of the WiFi networks in our experimental site, one primary reason caused the excessive number of APs is the virtual access point (VAP) functionality of enterprise WLAN infrastructure, which allows one physical AP to have multiple separate WLAN with its BSSID and SSID (service set identifier).…”
Section: Analysis Of Wifi Signal Observationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1 (right) bar chart shows the distribution of observed APs in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency band respectively. APs of 5 GHz dominates the observations with smallest and largest appearance frequency, which reveals that 5 GHz channels may be less crowded and weak signals in 5 GHz are more likely to be observed than that in 2.4 GHz [22]. Through empirical investigation of the WiFi networks in our experimental site, one primary reason caused the excessive number of APs is the virtual access point (VAP) functionality of enterprise WLAN infrastructure, which allows one physical AP to have multiple separate WLAN with its BSSID and SSID (service set identifier).…”
Section: Analysis Of Wifi Signal Observationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1 (right) bar chart shows the distribution of observed APs in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency band respectively. APs of 5 GHz dominates the observations with smallest and largest appearance frequency, which reveals that 5 GHz channels may be less crowded and weak signals in 5 GHz are more likely to be observed than that in 2.4 GHz [10]. Through empirical investigation of the WiFi networks in our experimental site, one major reason caused the excessive number of APs is the virtual access point (VAP) functionality of enterprise WLAN infrastructure, which allows one physical AP to have multiple separate WLAN with its own BSSID and SSID (service set identifier).…”
Section: Analysis Of Signal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This could have been avoided if AP2 (green) were to be used for some period of time. This issue is widely known as the "sticky client" problem [13], and our architecture is solving it [12]. In Fig.…”
Section: Horizontal Handovermentioning
confidence: 99%