2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A volumetric analysis of GTVD and CTVHR as defined by the GEC ESTRO recommendations in FIGO stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer patients treated with IGABT in a prospective multicentric trial (EMBRACE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 5-year local parametrial control has not significantly differed from that noted for the cervix. The FIGO Cancer Report [1] and EMBRACE [2] studies pointed out that parametrial doses should not be lower than 60-65 izoGy 2.0 as noted for the left parametrium in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, 5-year local parametrial control has not significantly differed from that noted for the cervix. The FIGO Cancer Report [1] and EMBRACE [2] studies pointed out that parametrial doses should not be lower than 60-65 izoGy 2.0 as noted for the left parametrium in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Studies on radiotherapy efficacy related to initial cervix (GTV CRX ) and left and right parametria (GTV LP , GTV RP ) volumes has been incidentally explored, although Dubben et al [11] convincingly documented cervix target volume as being the only significant predictor for treatment outcome. In the EMBRACE trial [2], the importance of volumetric staging was quantified in a group of 481 patients with cervix cancer in stage IIB and IIIB. All data was divided into five volumetric subgroups with a mean GTV in the range of 12.6-79.4 cm 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other metrics of the EMBRACE study cohort besides NF (e.g. tumour remission and morbidity) are subject of separate analyses [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Limited data exist on nodal disease at diagnosis and on nodal failure as a separate factor characterizing treatment outcomes for LACC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten centres use needles for dose optimisation, and one is planning to do so in the near future. The use of needles improves adequate target coverage and is related to improved local control without exceeding the dose constraints for OAR [28,29]. In the future, tumour coverage might be further improved with the possibility of using 'angulated' needle positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%