2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab8f5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A VLA Study of High-redshift GRBs. I. Multiwavelength Observations and Modeling of GRB 140311A

Abstract: We present the first results from a recently concluded study of GRBs at z  5 with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA). Spanning 1 to 85.5 GHz and 7 epochs from 1.5 to 82.3 days, our observations of GRB140311A are the most detailed joint radio and millimeter observations of a GRB afterglow at z  5 to date. In conjunction with optical/near-IR and X-ray data, the observations can be understood in the framework of radiation from a single blast wave shock with energy »É 8.5 10 K,iso 53 erg expanding into a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship between jet angle and redshift was suggested in Lloyd-Ronning et al (2002) (e.g. see their section 5.1.2), and observational evidence for this anti-correlation has also been put forth by Lü et al (2012) and Laskar et al (2014Laskar et al ( , 2018a.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This relationship between jet angle and redshift was suggested in Lloyd-Ronning et al (2002) (e.g. see their section 5.1.2), and observational evidence for this anti-correlation has also been put forth by Lü et al (2012) and Laskar et al (2014Laskar et al ( , 2018a.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The possibility of beaming angle being narrower at higher redshift has also been suggested by others (e.g. Lloyd-Ronning et al 2002;Lu et al 2012;Laskar et al 2014Laskar et al , 2018aLloyd-Ronning et al 2019a,b). These requirements require that the maximum redshift z max must satisfy the condition d 2…”
Section: A Brief Statement Of Our Cosmological Grbs Modelsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We note here that while the values for e  and B  given in Table 8 are the best-fit parameters, lower values of e  are feasible and are correlated with a lower energy, lower density, and higher value of B  (Figure 8). On the other hand, values of e  near or above equipartition have been found previously in other works, suggesting that the discrepancy could also arise owing to missing physics in the modeling process (Yost et al 2003;Cenko et al 2010Cenko et al , 2011Laskar et al 2015Laskar et al , 2016Laskar et al , 2018a. For instance, accounting for a fraction f 1 » % of the electrons accelerated by the shock would reduce e  by a corresponding amount (Eichler & Waxman 2005;Ressler & Laskar 2017).…”
Section: High Value Of E mentioning
confidence: 71%