2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A visualized study of micro-bubble emission boiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the maximum heat flux is not the CHF because the experiment was intentionally stopped at this point to avoid burning of the silicone sealing. These results correspond to those of a previous study that included the MEB regime (Zhu et al, 2014). Using the same setup, subcooled pool boiling tests were carried out for different gap heights.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We note that the maximum heat flux is not the CHF because the experiment was intentionally stopped at this point to avoid burning of the silicone sealing. These results correspond to those of a previous study that included the MEB regime (Zhu et al, 2014). Using the same setup, subcooled pool boiling tests were carried out for different gap heights.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Different from fully developed nucleate boiling and MEB, a vapor film covers most of the heating surface during the transition process and restrains the surrounding liquid reaching the heating surface, as shown in Figure . This behavior is much more similar to that in film boiling on a small heater under saturation and low liquid subcooling conditions . Ono and Sakashita deemed that the rapid increase in wall temperature for subcooled boiling on a small copper heater was arisen from the depletion of the liquid macrolayer underneath the vapor film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%