Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1785/0120010217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Virtual Subnetwork Approach to Earthquake Early Warning

Abstract: Progress has been made toward the goal of earthquake early warning in Taiwan. By applying the concept of a virtual subnetwork (VSN) to the Taiwan Central Weather Bureau seismic network, the earthquake rapid-reporting time has been reduced to about 30 sec or less by a new system called VSN. This represents a significant step toward realistic earthquake early-warning capability. The VSN system described here was put into operation from December 2000 to June 2001. A total of 54 earthquakes (100% correct detection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
91
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many early warning systems use a network of seismic instruments to determine earthquake magnitude and location (Anderson et al, 1995;Espinosa-Aranda et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1998;Wu and Teng, 2002;Allen and Kanamori, 2003;A. Lockman and R. M. Allen, unpublished manuscript, 2005), but here we focus on a single seismic station's ability to assess earthquake hazard using the first few seconds of the P wave by calculating three parameters needed for early warning: event magnitude, hypocentral distance, and backazimuth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many early warning systems use a network of seismic instruments to determine earthquake magnitude and location (Anderson et al, 1995;Espinosa-Aranda et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1998;Wu and Teng, 2002;Allen and Kanamori, 2003;A. Lockman and R. M. Allen, unpublished manuscript, 2005), but here we focus on a single seismic station's ability to assess earthquake hazard using the first few seconds of the P wave by calculating three parameters needed for early warning: event magnitude, hypocentral distance, and backazimuth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Seismic Alert System in Mexico City uses the peak ground motion measured near the Guerro Gap subduction zone to estimate magnitude, *Present address: Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley,307 McCone Hall,Berkeley,rallen@berkeley.edu. and conveys this information to the population in Mexico City, 300 km away, providing 60 sec or more warning of the impending ground motion (Anderson et al, 1995;Espinosa-Aranda et al, 1995). The Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan operates in a similar fashion, and can give a magnitude estimate about 22 sec after the P wave is detected and issue a warning to populations greater than 75 km from the epicenter (Wu et al, 1998;Wu and Teng, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, the first EEW system in Taiwan started operation and continues to be used today. It uses ~100 accelerometers deployed across the island and a Virtual Sub-Net (VSN) algorithm to detect and locate earthquakes and estimate magnitudes using the P-and S-wave energy (Wu and Teng 2002). On average, the system provides warnings 20 s after the origin time, corresponding to when the S wave is ~70 km from the epicenter.…”
Section: Istanbul Taiwan and Bucharestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of earthquake-prone countries are engaged in ongoing efforts to develop EEW systems having fast on accurate real-time operating EEW algorithm. Japan (Nakamura 1988;Odaka et al 2003;Kamigachi 2009), Mexico (Espinosa-Aranda et al 1995), Taiwan (Wu et al 1999;Wu & Teng 2002, Romania (Wenzel et al 1999;B€ ose et al 2007) and Turkey (Erdik et al 2003;B€ ose et al 2008;Alcik et al 2009) have developed EEW system, which proves effective in mitigating seismic risk at short time scales ). Other countries like California (Allen & Kanamori 2003;Allen et al 2009;Wurman et al 2007;Cua & Heaton 2007), Switzerland (Cua & Heaton 2007) and Italy (Satriano et al 2011) are in early stage of EEW system implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%