“…Forty studies from 49 articles examined evaluated the allocentric spatial orientation. In 32 of these articles noncoincident landmarks were used (Bullens, Igl oi, et al, 2010;Bullens, Nardini et al, 2010;Bullens, Klugkist, & Postma, 2011;Crowther et al, 2000;Hupbach & Nadel, 2005;Huttenlocher & Vasilyeva, 2003;Learmonth, Nadel, & Newcombe, 2002;Learmonth, Newcombe, & Huttenlocher, 2001;Learmonth, Newcombe, Sheridan, & Jones, 2008 Lew et al, , 2006Lourenco, Addy, & Huttenlocher, 2009;Lourenco & Cabrera, 2015;Mandolesi, Petrosini, Menghini, Addona, & Vicari, 2009;Merrill et al, 2016;Nardini, Atkinson, & Burgess, 2008;Nardini et al, 2006;Nardini, Jones, et al, 2008;Negen, Heywood-Everett, Roome, & Nardini, 2018;Newcombe, Ratliff, Shallcross, & Twyman, 2010;Pentland, Anderson, Dye, & Wood, 2003;; Rodriguez-Andres, Juan, Mendez-Lopez, Perez-Hernandez, & Lluch, 2016; Rodriguez-Andres, Mendez-Lopez, Juan, & Perez-Hernandez, 2018;Ruggiero et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2019;Yousif & Lourenco, 2017), while one article used coincident landmarks (Kaufman & Needham, 2011 Although 5-year-olds obtain spatial learning scores similar to those of older ages, they perform the task more slowly than the 10-year-olds. In addition, at age 5, there is a clear preference for adopting an egocentric orientation strategy, which persists at higher ages but in a less marked way.…”