2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2017.2749450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Virtual Multi-Terminal Current Differential Protection Scheme for Distribution Networks With Inverter-Interfaced Distributed Generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M-side denotes the PVPP side, whereas the N-side denotes the system side. protection [24][25][26][27][28], they have not discussed the specific fault characteristics of PVPPs or conducted an analysis from a mathematical viewpoint. When compared with previous studies, this study is the first to derive the mathematical expression of the ratio of differential current over restraint current, and its dynamic characteristics are analyzed.…”
Section: Overview Of the Pv Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The M-side denotes the PVPP side, whereas the N-side denotes the system side. protection [24][25][26][27][28], they have not discussed the specific fault characteristics of PVPPs or conducted an analysis from a mathematical viewpoint. When compared with previous studies, this study is the first to derive the mathematical expression of the ratio of differential current over restraint current, and its dynamic characteristics are analyzed.…”
Section: Overview Of the Pv Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have investigated the influence of the renewable energy power stations on current differential protection[24][25][26][27][28]. However, those studies did not discuss or analyze the specific fault characteristics of PVPPs from a mathematical viewpoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy is improved but the impedance is complex to calculate and its structure is different from that of the nature VSC. Further studies in [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] show that the inverter's characteristics and the control strategy are the keys to model IIDG during the fault, and scholars are trying to model the IIDG during the fault under different control strategies (PQ control [7][8][9][10][11], V/f control [12,13] and droop control [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in [13], a unified model applicable to IIDGs adopting flexible PQ control strategies is proposed by deducing the uniform expression of the current reference of the inverter. Based on the fault model of IIDG, fault analysis of DN with several IIDGs are proposed in [14][15][16], which solve network equations and the fault model of IIDGs alternately in an iterative way to calculate nodes' voltage, fault current and the other fault variables, supporting the protection system configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these issues, advanced protection concepts have been proposed over the last years, which mainly concern MV distribution systems and reconsider conventional-overcurrent-relay-based protection schemes. These concepts are protective-relay-based and mainly apply directional overcurrent protection [19][20][21], distance protection [22,23], differential protection [24][25][26], or other alternative techniques [27][28][29].In LV distribution systems, similar protection issues are encountered when DGs are present [30]. Another challenge comes from the non-settable nature of the fuses that are typically installed as protection means in LV distribution networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%