2022
DOI: 10.3390/sports10030031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Video-Based Tactical Task Does Not Elicit Mental Fatigue and Does Not Impair Soccer Performance in a Subsequent Small-Sided Game

Abstract: Mental fatigue can impair physical, technical, and tactical performance in sports. Since most previous research used general cognitive tasks to elicit mental fatigue, the aim of this study was to investigate whether a more sport-specific task could induce the effects of mental fatigue and impair the subsequent physical and technical performance in a soccer small-sided game. Ten soccer players performed two small-sided games on two different days in a crossover design. Before each small-sided game, they perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors recruited a small-sided game (SSG) and did not uncover any significant difference between the experimental and control group in total distances running (1,531 ± 142 m vs. 1,531 ± 125 m, ES = 0.00). The non-significant finding was corroborated by another two studies that investigated total distance in SSG (P > 0.05) (Trecroci et al, 2020;Ciocca et al, 2022). Inconsistently, Kunrath et al (2020) conducted a study to examine tactical and physical performance together.…”
Section: Physical Performancementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors recruited a small-sided game (SSG) and did not uncover any significant difference between the experimental and control group in total distances running (1,531 ± 142 m vs. 1,531 ± 125 m, ES = 0.00). The non-significant finding was corroborated by another two studies that investigated total distance in SSG (P > 0.05) (Trecroci et al, 2020;Ciocca et al, 2022). Inconsistently, Kunrath et al (2020) conducted a study to examine tactical and physical performance together.…”
Section: Physical Performancementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, one study mixed 4 types of team sport athletes (soccer, Australian football, rugby, and field hockey) (Smith et al, 2015). Furthermore, eleven experiments were done on technical performance in 3 types of team sports: soccer (Badin et al, 2016;Smith et al, 2016Smith et al, , 2017Moreira et al, 2018;Filipas et al, 2020;Trecroci et al, 2020;Ciocca et al, 2022;Soylu et al, 2022), basketball (Filipas et al, 2021), and Australian football (Weerakkody et al, 2020).…”
Section: Sport-specific Motor Performance Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the investigations on technical performance focused on offensive and defensive skills. Moreover, all studies used 30 min-Stroop events to prompt mental fatigue conditions, beside, one investigation used a 30 min-tactical task (18). Moreover, the analyzed studies were comprehensively examined from the lab (e.g., the Loughborough soccer pass assessment) to the field.…”
Section: Overview Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies have shown inconsistent results. For example, Ciocca et al (18) found that mental fatigue did not influence the number of successful tackles. In addition, Smith et al (19) did not find any influence on the reaction time of passing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, pilot studies are more conducive to the rigorous, fast-paced environment within professional sports offering feasibility and a preview of methodological challenges for larger studies ( 10 , 11 ). In this work, a lengthier intervention would have been desirable, especially considering that viewing tactical video (the nature of our intervention) has shown not to elicit mental fatigue nor impair subsequent physical and technical performance ( 12 ). In addition, more subjects and subsequent passes would have served to power the study and improve test-retest reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%