2002
DOI: 10.1021/bi015729e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Vibrational Spectroscopic Investigation of Interactions of Agonists with GluR0 a Prokaryotic Glutamate Receptor

Abstract: We have used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to provide a detailed picture of the interactions between the carboxylate groups of the ligands, glutamate, serine, and glutamine, with the ligand-binding domain of a prokaryotic ionotropic glutamate receptor (GluR0). The vibrational spectra indicate that the noncovalent interactions between the 1C(alpha)-carboxylate moiety of the ligand and the protein are stronger for glutamate than for serine and glutamine. These results correlate well with the higher aff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) in homogeneous D 2 O solvent and compare our results with the corresponding frequencies measured by the FTIR experiment (provided in Table I). [27][28][29] Several recently reported computational studies of spectroscopic properties of single amino acids in aqueous solution were nearly in quantitative agreement with the experimental results. Both continuum and molecular solvent models as well as various hybrid continuum/ molecular approaches were employed.…”
Section: A Glutamate In a Homogeneous Liquid Watersupporting
confidence: 63%
“…1) in homogeneous D 2 O solvent and compare our results with the corresponding frequencies measured by the FTIR experiment (provided in Table I). [27][28][29] Several recently reported computational studies of spectroscopic properties of single amino acids in aqueous solution were nearly in quantitative agreement with the experimental results. Both continuum and molecular solvent models as well as various hybrid continuum/ molecular approaches were employed.…”
Section: A Glutamate In a Homogeneous Liquid Watersupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The frequency of the asymmetric carboxylate stretching vibration is extremely sensitive to the overall electrostatic environment of the carboxylate and has been shown to exhibit a linear dependence on the strength of the noncovalent interactions at this moiety, with a 3-cm Ϫ1 downshift corresponding to a Ϫ1-kcal change in enthalpy at the carboxylate (15). Based on these studies, the 4-cm Ϫ1 downshift in the ␣-carboxylate mode of glutamate on binding to the GluR2-S1S2 indicates a favorable Ϫ1.3 kcal/mol interaction for this moiety in the protein, relative to D 2 O.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetric carboxylate vibration for α-amino acids typically occurs in the region of 1610 to 1630 cm −1 (5)(6)(7)19,22), and hence the bands at 1629 cm −1 in the HW and FW spectra and at 1632 cm −1 in the ClW and IW spectra can be assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibration of the α-carboxylate, while the higher frequency modes can be assigned to the stretching vibrations of the two other carbonyl moieties present in the willardiine structures. Specifically, the vibrations at 1653 cm −1 (FW), 1655 cm −1 (HW), 1652 cm −1 (IW), and 1658 cm −1 (ClW) can be assigned to the carbonyl moiety at the 2 position on the ring (Figure 1) due to the fact that this carbonyl is further from the halogen substitution, and the vibrations due to this moiety are not significantly affected by the substituent.…”
Section: Environment Of the Willardiines Free In Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference spectra for the free willardiines and bound willardiines exhibit an 11 cm −1 downshift in the asymmetric carboxylate vibration for FW and HW upon binding to GluR2-S1S2 and a 14 cm −1 downshift in the asymmetric carboxylate vibration for ClW and IW upon binding to GluR2-S1S2. Since the frequency of the asymmetric carboxylate vibration can be directly correlated to the strength of the interaction at this moiety (22), these downshifts would correspond to a ΔH of −3.7 kcal/mol when FW and HW bind to GluR2-S1S2 and ΔH of −4.7 kcal/mol when ClW and IW bind to GluR2-S1S2 as compared to the ligands free in solution.…”
Section: Willardiine Environment When Bound To the Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%