2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cc01544a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A viable strategy for screening the effects of glycan heterogeneity on target organ adhesion and biodistribution in live mice

Abstract: This work represents the first broad study of testing diverse heterogenous glycoconjugates (7 different glycoalbumins) for their differential in vivo binding (11 different cancer cell types) in both cell- and animal-based studies. As a result, various changes in biodistribution, excretion, and even tumor adhesion were observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The glycoclusters' capability to bind cells was determined via TAMRA fluorescence. As we observed with most of the glycoalbumins so far investigated, [4] our glycoalbumins internalized into the cells (representative microscopy image in Figure S34 in the Supporting Information). But for our cell targeting purposes, it does not matter whether glycoalubumins internalize or not.…”
Section: Synthesis and In Vitro Tumor Targeting Of Heterogeneous Glycsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The glycoclusters' capability to bind cells was determined via TAMRA fluorescence. As we observed with most of the glycoalbumins so far investigated, [4] our glycoalbumins internalized into the cells (representative microscopy image in Figure S34 in the Supporting Information). But for our cell targeting purposes, it does not matter whether glycoalubumins internalize or not.…”
Section: Synthesis and In Vitro Tumor Targeting Of Heterogeneous Glycsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…So far, several heterovalent structures have been reported for studying the interaction process with a large class of carbohydrate-specific proteins (i.e., glycosidases, glycosyltransferases, lectins, antibodies) (Deguise et al, 2007; Ortega-Muñoz et al, 2009; Gómez-García et al, 2010; Lindhorst et al, 2010; Karskela et al, 2012; Abellán Flos et al, 2016; Vincent et al, 2016; Ortiz Mellet et al, 2017; Gade et al, 2018; Ogura et al, 2018) or for triggering multifaceted immune response against tumor cells (Ragupathi et al, 2002; Zhu et al, 2009; Pett et al, 2017). These studies highlight the complexity of heterocluster effects and reinforce the need of new structures to go one step further toward the understanding of naturally occurring recognition events and the development of more active compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This favourable aspect is also a part of the in vivo studies with labelled neoglycoproteins presenting natural and synthetic glycans up to custom-made microheterogeneity used for targeting and imaging. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89] On the side of the proteins, mimicking the natural occurrence of lectins in mixtures, in terms of constituents and relative concentrations, will enable to trace currently not well-dened consequences of competition for binding sites and crossreactivity of glycoclusters among lectins. Given the assay's reliability and sensitivity as well as its use with any type of tissue, its application is advised, prior to considering testing glycoclusters in vivo, for example to minimise such overlaps in target binding by iterative structural renements including headgroup chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%