2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A vertical and horizontal crossover sine cosine algorithm with pattern search for optimal power flow in power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this particular scenario, the influence of FACTS devices on decreasing power losses within the electrical transmission network is evidently more significant than in other instances. The power loss attained by CGO amounts to 1.761859 MW, which is lower than the values of 2.2278212 MW in RIME, 2.8777 MW in OOA, 1.9416 MW in SMA, 2.482 MW in SCA [21], 1.880 MW in IMO [21], 1.7898 MW in GWO [22], 1.9736 MW in FPA [22], and 2.0420 MW in SCA [22]. As illustrated in Table 12, all algorithms exhibit reduced power losses compared to previous cases.…”
Section: B Casementioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this particular scenario, the influence of FACTS devices on decreasing power losses within the electrical transmission network is evidently more significant than in other instances. The power loss attained by CGO amounts to 1.761859 MW, which is lower than the values of 2.2278212 MW in RIME, 2.8777 MW in OOA, 1.9416 MW in SMA, 2.482 MW in SCA [21], 1.880 MW in IMO [21], 1.7898 MW in GWO [22], 1.9736 MW in FPA [22], and 2.0420 MW in SCA [22]. As illustrated in Table 12, all algorithms exhibit reduced power losses compared to previous cases.…”
Section: B Casementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Specifically, in the CGO algorithm, the total generation cost decreased to $807.0393/h, which is lower than the costs observed in the RIME algorithm ($808.5072/h), OOA algorithm ($817.0351/h), and SMA algorithm ($807.496018/h). Additionally, the CGO algorithm's cost was lower compared to other algorithms studied, such as MVO [21] ($808.030/h), ALO [21] ($809.449/h), SCA [21] ($818.654/h), CBA [22] ($810.5056/h), FPA [22] ($808.0864/h), and SCA [22] ($815.4325/h), as shown in Figure 12. This indicates that the CGO approach yielded a lower cost compared to the other algorithms.…”
Section: A Casementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Given these limitations, there is a need to employ straightforward concepts and easily implementable optimization techniques that do not require gradient definitions. Benchmark methods such as Salp Swarm and Sine Cosine Optimization have been verified in different power system applications, including power flow analysis [21,22], parameter estimation [23,24], parameter extraction of solar photovoltaic models using rat swarm optimization [25], power system stabilizer [26], stability improvement [27], and optimization of retaining walls [28,29]. Popular optimization techniques such as Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [30], Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) [31], Student Psychology-Based Optimization (SPBO) [32], Symbiotic Organisms Search (SOS) [33], and Firefly algorithm (FFO) [34] have been introduced, offering alternative approaches to address these challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], an effective hybrid technique using the Whale algorithm and Moth-Flame method is designed and applied to solve several power management problems. In [26], a vertical and horizontal crossover sine cosine algorithm combined with a pattern search algorithm is designed (CPSCA-PS) to enhance the performance of modern electric systems by integrating various types of FACTS devices. Various objective functions related to the OPF are optimized considering the integration of three types of FACTS devices: TCSC, TCPS, SVC, and two Wind sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%